Why does x sue the Indian government as Musk Woos Modi? | Elon Musk News

When I met with Elon Muskra Narendra Modi in Washington DC in February, Spacex and Tesla President presented the Prime Minister of India to his family. Described the Modi meeting as “very good”.

Modi was in the United States to see President Donald Trump. Modi’s meeting with Musk, two, according to the Indian Foreign Ministry, spacecraft, in the field of space exploration, innovation and sustainable development, spacecraft, innovation, innovation and sustainable development cooperation.

However, almost a month later, the social media platform of the social media, claimed to censor the newly Delhi’s online Delhi, filed a lawsuit against the Indian government.

The court comes as musk edges that are closer to starting both Starlink and Tesla In India.

Why does Xi court sue India as he tried to be charming?

Why does the Indian government sue?

On March 5, the Indian government claimed that the Indian government’s “uncertain parallel mechanism” or government officials and ministries of the Indian government prevented the Internet in the country’s “illegal parallel mechanism” to regulate the country’s information technology act.

In October 2000, in 69, the Indian Ministry of IT gives the Indian Ministry’s National Security and the country’s national security and “Meity is investigating the content of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technologies (Meity).

Now the Indian government has introduced a new mechanism to delete the content – the IT Act (B) section with a separate blocking process.

Section 79 (3) (b) Allows you to remove online content after a simple notice from a public official. Notifications to delete the content can be sent through the portal “Sahyog” (means in English “without any form of the court review.

The Indian government requires social media platforms to the Sahyog portal such as X, but the social media platform claims to do so “arbitrary censorship”.

“The establishment of the establishment of the new legal censorship (Sahyog portal), as a government department, earlier this year, in the beginning of this year, February,” A lawyer and co-founder of the Internet Fund Fund, “Al-Aid, Al Aid, said.

“Through the parallel censorship system, the government took a step by law. This instance has dignity prepared by the X,” Gupta said.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) member (BJP) member and former Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar said.

The case of the government was announced on March 20 with the news of the Indian media on March 20, and the next hearing is in Karnataka Supreme Court on March 27.

Al-Jazeera contacted the Indian Ministry of Dog and the Judge BJP Party.

Does it argue over x’s chatbot managing the case?

It doesn’t seem like that. In Meity officials told local media that Chatbot, built on the social media platform, talks to X on content created in GroK 3.

In recent weeks, the groc caused the Judge BJP government to interfere in India by creating content and answers to the questions of users considered “offensive and controversial.”

When asked an X user, Prime Minister Modi Modi’s interview answers are written, chatbot be responsible: “Modi’s interviews are often scripted – the answers are polished, in the message and rarely the narrative.

Gupta said, “The number of things that are called a large number of self-censorship and digital authoritarianism are, especially the basis of the stream of information included in Chatbot, conversation and appealing journalist articles. “

“But it is necessary to understand that it is a person who is trained in common sources and this, which can reflect the wrong information about it,” he said.

“There is no connection between the strife reactions that create a case and a viral trend. The only attitude is the same government (MEity) (MEity) (MEity).”

What does this mean for X users in India?

Gupta said the result was very early to say what would happen to the country’s X users.

“There was friction between government and major social media platforms in India. This is the fact that the government is often placed on constitutional constraints, and any impetus for political reasons is very highly necessary in closed societies,” he said.

“In this case, in this case, informing the X for the Gateedowns of the X, which was presented before the capture of the Musk, and the content of the content of the X.

Will the escalate damage to the prospects in India?

Experts are unlikely to say. Michael Kugelman, South Asian Institute, Wilson, Wilson, DC, in the center of Wilson, wealth and investment capital, said that he was preparing to place “a large number of goals” and updates and renewable energy.

Musk was also appointed by Trump, headed by the new branch of the US government (DOGE), and claimed that the swings reduce and found the federal works of the swings Billions of dollars waste and fraud in public expenditure.

“He has a great way to increase this goal. Thus, it is as a great way as it wants without the risk of alienation of the new Delhi. Starlink and Tesla can move on the principle of ‘Free Speech Promotion’ on social media.” O It has already reached agreements with Telecom companies in India and negotiate with others. Plans to present a Tesla production base in the country.

Similarly, the effect of this suit will be small in US-Indian relations. “Given all the different ways of all different ways playing in a relationship, this X spat is the best case and the worst case is a blip in the worst case.

“Therefore, if the legal process will play, X will want to paste it in India. The obligation can help prevent possible bilateral tension.”