Why are large countries unable to agree on how artificial intelligence adjustment
This week, it is designed to bring together a global agenda for the EU summit collected in Paris this week, to appoint a global agenda against fast-growing technology. Instead, some of them showed that they were dramatically separated.
Over the past few years, the European Union has followed the aggressive regulation of great technology, and investigated American companies as Google and Apple and examined several laws that follow their activities closely. Meanwhile, the Trump management made a technical regulation of the agenda for the removal of the red ribbon for the removal of the red ribbon for the innovation.
Thus, in the United States, including Canada, China, Australia and France, a document that promises an accessible and comprehensive approach to the EI, the United States and the media have raised the eyebrows.
“This tension here, on the one hand, on the one hand, on the one hand, the need to adjust this by the AI ​​innovation, on the other side, Teresa Scassa, a professor Canadian research department holds the Department of Canada research on the right and politics Ottawa.
Vance rails against ‘excessive’ regulation
The United States, for example, is the house of a large US company.
Meanwhile, England – which Scassa saw notes Economic crisis Brexit – He said he tried to place himself as an alternative to the more conservative approach to EU regulation of the EU.
The British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was a spokesman country would only invest in initiatives in the national interests.
The American position in the AI ​​regulation, the vice-president of the summit was more clear through comments by JD Vance, and said that the EU criticized the conservative approach to kill the industry.
Then the countries turned out to be aware of working with China, so they said they would make them sensitive to spying.
China criticized the Summit’s main document for a long time for the experience of human rights experience. Surprised by some observers, because the pledge called on the development of AI to a human rights.
US President Donald Trump, inauguration, Millions Google, Apple, Amazon and Meta, lifted a record amount of corporate donations for the inner forgiveness by major technological companies. Andrew Chang, since its early cycle, explains the symbolism of the TRUC’s relations with these industrial leaders and the symbolism of the president. Pictures provided by Getty Images, Reuters and Canadian Press.
The President of the European Commission said he hoped to be “different approach” to go to Ursula Von Der Leyen, the summit, the AI ​​leader in Europe, but “different approach” to go there.
He and other European officials have Recently protested Perception that the relatively stiff rules of the EU are not open to innovation. On the contrary, he said in the event of Paris.
“The fact is very far from the AI. The truth is that it is only on the beginning. The global leadership is still being seized.”
Says the macroe left behind the EU
A friend Martin-Bariteau professor at Ottawa University, who took part in the summit, said that France received a different attitude than the guests expect.
President of France Emmanuel Macron, the President of France, co-chairing with Indian Narendra Modi, struck the choking toneIt is mainly broken with the rest of the EU’s messaging. He suggested that the economic coalition could be very far away by regulating technology and saying that their countries are “fall behind“
However, “the biggest surprise for many people”, the last declaration signed in the Paris summit – a strong political, as a measure of adjustment, the arrangement was lighter with several detail, security and misrepresentation.
This week’s artificial intelligence sector, DeepSeek this week, a Chinese-centered conversation, the latest AI models – presented the latest AI models for only $ 6 million. This is part of the costs of US companies to spend normally and spend shares between great technological players. Philippe Beaudoin, AI researcher and Numeno.Ai General Director, what this means for this industry means.
A similar summit in London last summer was directed to the potential risks of the EU, Martin-Bariteau said. This time it seemed a priority this time, he said that he demonstrated a skyup of how they approached the settlement of countries.
“It can be a wonderful technology, but in recent months, it can also be very risky and realistic, especially in the use of such technology,” he said, especially the potential, “said Global election use in the intervention.
Other critics of the document moused In the recent agreement, the language of security and inclusion was decreased to appeal to the new US management and its major technological allies. Some reports suggested that England The following was The US management in the United States – declined in the British statement, indefinitely National security issues.
Companies looked in excessively adjustable countries
Some large technological companies have left the areas they exist overcastOlivier Blais, co-founder of the Montreal consulting company, said Moov AI.
Last year, this was the case in the European Union, which includes its regulation by the EU’s law. In addition, in 2023, a competitive law, which was partially applied to the digital markets, accepted the law. Apple asked the last account Why did not create features including apples exploration Said there was widespread in the region.
The growing impact of the Silicon Valley was on the in-touch ceremony of the US President Donald Trump’s inauguration of the US President Donald Trump. CBC’s Jonathan Montpetit supports the world’s richest technological Bros. Trump, and how they want what they want.
The EU creates what is referring to those in the industry as a commercial barrier. “In terms of consumer, you do not have access to these tools, because this does not have access to these tools,” he said.
However, the lack of entrance can also be more critical of technology: “Is it really responsible? Is it really safe to use these tools? It’s a very legal question,” he said. “Such people use these tools without asking themselves.”
The adjustment environment is increasingly complicated
The two largest trade partners of the disagreement between the United States and the United States and the EU, the number of disagreements between the two largest trade partners and the disagreement between the two largest trade partners.
Canada currently has no comprehensive legislation regulating the AI; federal government proposed Last year, such a bill died when the parliament was assessed in January. The questions of regulation – generally have been in the air since then.
As technology is more complicated, the regulatory environment added the regulatory environment, including social security, incorrect and disinformation and climate effects.
“Some priorities are changing and they can change differently for different countries.”
English