When it comes to Justin Baldonia against Blaik Liveli, of course, who wins

Baldoni was not only her Castor, but was also the director of the film who put it in the position of power over the “gossip”. The alive accused him of using this force for sexual persecution and shame on the set. On the other hand, Baldoni accused her of trying to fight creative control over the film away.

So who is right? Who isn’t it? With the lawsuits flying on both sides, you still have to find out who is going to win in court, but in the court of public opinion, it seems, Laila’s ship is slowly immersed.

The #metoo movement may no longer be in the spotlight, but it did not prevent women from being persecuted in movies. But is this really what happened here? Given the information that was born, it seems that it was uncomfortable on the set and may have been justified. Not being there to witness things from the first mouth, who is difficult to conclude that it actually happened behind closed doors.

Many people would say that if she was so uncomfortable with Baldon, she would have to express her problems with him long before she was shot. And I agree with that. Does the lawsuit file right after the movie has already finished? If she is being persecuted as she claims, so, perhaps, if she was afraid of some revenge, but the evidence that appeared still did not look like a woman who was afraid to use her voice.

Baldoni’s team traced the treasure trove of information and even launched your own web -sa called “Information about a lawsuit”, which is divided by the alleged text messages that include themselves, alive and her husband, Ryan Ryinolds. This situation came out of -under control that even a close girlfriend of a living pop stars Taylor Swiftwas involved in the lawsuit. Ultimately, it looks like the alive is the one who put her there.

If you are going to shoot a romantic drama involved in the family, you need a closeness coordinator on the set. “It ends with us,” had a closeness coordinator, but, according to Baldoni’s complaint, Livein decided to miss the original meeting where they posted sex scenes in the movie and how they would play on the screen.

After she “refused” to the meeting, Baldoni claims that he was put in “less ideal position to pass these notes to revive in her penthouses” and used such terms as “go to it”, “orgasm” and “” “and” prelude “.

His lawyers claim that “these notes will later become the basis for the complaint of Lail, in which she states that Baldoni will tell about her own sex life and insert the gratuitous scenes with the orgasm of the Laila character.”

After reading her lawsuit, it seems that this conversation was part of its persecution requirements, but it should be noted that there were strange comments to work with the coordinator of the proximity before. In an interview with August 2024 with Access to HollywoodLively addressed some strange comments about being her own closeness coordinator on the set. “By the way, this should not happen. I just want to be understood,” she said when asked what it is as “being coordinator of closeness on some of these sexual scenes.”

“You don’t have to be a coordinator of intimacy. You must hire the coordinators of the closeness,” she added. “What we had, thank God.”

Then the interviewer described “Sexy scene” where Lively taught Baldon as “pull” her Colin Hoover Who jumped into the conversation and said he saw her on Instagram. When she continued the interview, she lived uncomfortable when she was drawing the ends of her hair and stuted a little.

At the end of January, behind -the -scenes shots of the romantic dance scene appeared on the Internet. A video obtained Tmzshows that they exchange uncomfortable bangs, swaying there. This scene is important because it was directly described in live proof that Baldoni pursued her.

According to the court file, Lively claimed that Baldoni “leaned forward and slowly pulled his lips out of his ear and said:” It smells so good “… When Ms Lively later objected to this behavior, Mr. Baldon. “I didn’t even attract you.”

In the video, Baldon makes an inconvenient joke that his nose is “so big” after living his attention. The alive also tells him, “I probably get a tan on you,” Baldoni replies: “It smells good.”

This is certainly putting a description of the scene Lively in the future.

According to Baldoni’s claim, the living meant that she “changed his mind” about asking Taylor Swift to use her song “My Tears Ricochet” in the film trailer if her requirements are not fulfilled. In this case, the requirements were editing the film rights. Baldoni’s application included allegedly text exchange with Sony’s Executive Company: Read:

“Blake urges Taylor to approve the song. She, of course, just stretched, saying that she was asking for (edited) by her editor. We know this trailer and blake does not change when she calls Taylor Swift.”

Another alleged text message shows Baldoni and Live, which turn to the change of the script that the veins wanted to do. In the texting, they turn to a meeting that took place in Penthaus Lila, both Reynolds and Swift.

Baldoni told her that “really” loved the changes she made, and considered that they made the stage on the roof more “fun and interesting”, but noted that “he would feel so without Ryan and Taylor.”

Then alive compared himself to the character “Game of Thrones”, allegedly answering:

“I have a few dragons. For the best or worse, but usually for the best. Because my dragons also protect those for which I fight. So, we all use these wonderful monsters., I can promise you.”

It remains to learn how Taylor Swift feels that it is called a “wonderful monster”. There were conflicting reports of their friendship, but it should be noted that they were not photographed together since October. Other reports have shown that Swift never even had to be on the meetingBut it just happened when Swift went to visit her girlfriend.

Lailla’s attempt to promote the movie met with measures within a few weeks after she treated the movie as a traditional Roma-com, and urged fans to “grab the girls, carry their flowers” while going to the theater. Perhaps this is a bit on the nose to create a story about a girl named Lily, which runs a flower shop, but fans on the Internet have considered that it was inappropriate to reduce the film about the family violence to something more like Barbie.

According to Baldonia’s complaint on his site, Lively appealed to their production team and asked them to blame for the negative press, which she received during the promotion of the film, which also included A interviewed to make it rough to reporter.

According to the documents of the Baldoni court, Lively and Reynolds “Demand (Ed)” to make their statement to the baldoni and the name of his company, and this refusal meant that “gloves would come off”. It is quite clear that the Baldoni production team has never released the application and the gloves are really breaking away.

So, when it comes to Justina Baldoni against Blake Livel, who will come to the top?

Christine says that when it comes to public opinion court, Baldoni has the top. It tosses his dirty lingerie all over the internet to all see (including awkward 2 o’clock voice memo), seeking to confirm yourself with the requirements of Lively. He wants to make it clear that her accusations have no merit, and judging by what was exposed, it certainly makes you look alive as an aggressor.

At the same time, Lively marries Ryan Reynolds, and it is doubtful that her career – or his, on this matter – will be affected by a lawsuit, which is currently not planned to start by March 2026. Baldoni already scored a legitimate victory on Monday when The judge rejected the LIVEL requestThis means that in the coming weeks is probably even more evidence.

Baldoni can be difficult to pick up his career works, no matter what way his legal battle unfolds, but he can leave all this by proving that she does not pursue the living in how she stated, and for him that for Its, what, that’s, what, for him, what, that, what is for him, that, what, what is for him, that, that for him, it is that for him, what for him, what, what, what, This excuse may be enough.