‘We will not be empty’: legal groups claim suit against Trump shelter ban | Donald Trump News

Washington, DC – Several Immigrants Legal Groups, as well as the American Civil Committee Union (ACLU), as well as claiming a lawsuit, claimed that President Donald Trump has been banned.

The case is the most recent attempt by Trump Hardline immigration policyThey have already targeted people who are inside the country and seeking security from abroad.

Like other claims against Trump management, Monday complaint The president exceeds the Constitutional Organization and claims to violate the existing law.

Currently, asylum seekers are legal to pass to the United States if they are not persecuted.

“This is an unprecedented power to life under the threat,” Lee Gallant, Deputy Director of the Lee Gallant, Deputy Director of Aclu’s Immigrants, said statement.

“No president has no authority to cancel a unilateral basis Congress helped the following in this danger.”

The complaint references the US government to domestic legislation and international contractual obligations that require shelter. This includes Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

“With Immigration and Nationality Act, Congress created a comprehensive legal system that allows you to torture and torture to avoid refugees and torture to avoid defense and torture in the United States,” he said.

“The government is based on the basis of the Congress on the basis of the regulations to prevent the US, the United States.

Announcement one day

On Monday, the complaint is directly aimed at one of the announcements signed on the first day of the second term.

Shortly after the inauguration ceremony on January 20, Trump opened document “Guaranteed to the states of protection of occupation”, “.

This announced that undocumented immigrants were restricted to the provisions of Ina, which permitted continuous participation in the United States.

The republican leader described the risks of “national security” as well as his justification. He also claimed that the southern border of the United States was “excessive” with entrances.

“Therefore, until the United States has stopped the occupation of these foreigners on the southern border of these foreigners, such foreigners have stopped and wrote” Trump “.

The republic’s leader took a long campaign for the emigration for the emigration, including immigration for asylum seekers.

Its 2024 re-election proposal, including the same firebrand rhetoric, including the migrant occupation of the United States.

Trump has repeatedly accused the documents for the woes of the country until unemployed from severe crime.

A decline

However, groups such as ACLU used the judicial system, using the judicial system, trying to push them back using the judicial system.

The Court of Allegation claims that Trump’s announcement in Monday, not only contrary to US laws, but also contradicts the obligations of international agreements.

For example, the United States confirmed the 1967 protocol related to the condition of refugees and refugees.

Jennifer Babaie, head of Advocacy and legal services in the Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in Texas on Monday, said the lawsuit did not stop as our immigration law managed.

“No matter the personal belief in any person’s immigration, it is a serious issue that affects all the government’s laws and affect all communities in the country,” Babaie said.

Texas based groups, Texas Civil Rights Project, Education and Law Service (RAICES) and Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights and Refugees Center and Refugees are one of the fourth bidders and the fourth bidders.

Wave of legal problems

However, immigration actions went beyond the second period of the second term of the second term of the second term.

Trump was signed in the first hours of the presidency a few Execution measures designed to limit immigration and expel undocumented people in the United States.

Trump has increased immigration protection activities, increased troops to the US border, has stopped the US refugee program 90 days and canceled an online application used by asylum seekers to determine immigration appointments.

Some asylum seekers were waiting for the meetings in the app that booked as one of the CBPs. The application of the application canceled their scheduled meetings, leaving them limbo.

Next result, law groups created a legal problem that questioned the collapse of CBP.

Other legal problems are trying to oppose the expansion of Trump’s “accelerated removal” processes to quickly withdraw undocumented persons from the country.

Others tried to cancel a business order suspending financial services for legal services to detain immigrants.

Meanwhile, propaganda groups and various government governments have at least five court lawsuits against the decision of Trump end Intensity citizenship in the United States.

In January, a federal judge quickly blocked the order of Trump, called it “obvious constitutional”.