US says revenue from minerals deal will fuel Ukraine’s postwar growth

Open the White House viewing newsletter for free

Your Guide to What is the US 2024 Choice for Washington and the World

The Secretary of the US Treasury defended Donald Trump’s instructions on agreement with Ukraine to have its own natural resources and critical minerals, saying that the plan will observe the post-war growth.

Scott Bessent’s Comment OP-ED for Financial Times Come, because Trump’s administrative officials are trying to restrain what they claim that the economic partnership with Kiev as a peaceful deal between Russia and Ukraine to develop a broader diplomatic pressure.

Ukrainian officials have so far rejected the requirements of such an agreement, but US officials are strictly putting pressure on the transaction.

In Kiev, officials believe that Trump’s attack on Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelensky described him as a dictator and offering Ukraine, not Russia, war, and knew the transaction.

In OP-ED, Beynet put part of the US proposal. He said that the income of “natural resources, infrastructure and other assets” “will be allocated to the Foundation, focusing on Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction and development, where US has economic and management rights in those further investments.”

However, Best did not say how much mineral extraction revenue will be provided to the fund or how much money will be paid to the United States. Trump presented the mineral deal, as Ukraine pays the previous US military assistance from Ukraine.

The earlier project of Ukrainian media reports, which was said to be accurate, said that the foundation will be regulated “with the deployment of such income.”

He also said that the United States will decide how much money it will be paid for reconstruction projects.

In his OP-ED, Batet said that the agreement would include “high standards of transparency, accountability, corporate governance, and the involvement of post-war growth investments in Ukraine” will not leave any place for corruption and its own transactions. ”

The Secretary of the US Treasury has traveled to Ukraine at the beginning of this month on his first international trip to buy the transaction. Volodymyr ZelenskyyPresident:

Before US officials, including Trump National Security Adviser Mike Valts, say that the deal is close, Ukrainian officials are more protected.

“The table project now needs more work,” said the person involved in the negotiations. “We see many of Ukraine’s commitments and very weak things there [offered] The American side, so the project, as today, is not ready to receive the presidential level. “

The talks passed early in the morning and will continue on Saturday and probably until Sunday.

Zelensky said that Bainey’s original proposal was not interested in Ukraine, as it demanded 50 percent of the country’s roughly rights and non-support proposals.

High-ranking Ukrainian officials said last week was falsifiers who discussed with the US Special Underworld of Ukraine, Kate Kellog, on Thursday and Friday.

Zelenskyy wants trump to provide security guarantees in a new offer before they agree to login.

In OP-ED, Batey noted that the terms of the deal “ensure that countries that do not contribute to the protection of Ukraine’s sovereignty will not be able to use its reconstruction or these investments.”

Beynents also suggested that the United States did not try to oversee Ukraine’s natural resources. “Let’s be clear what is not. The United States will not accept the property of physical assets in Ukraine. Neither more owed to Ukraine. This type of economic pressure, while located by other global actors, would not advance the non-Ukrainian interests of the American interests, “he wrote.