Trump’s “very large crane” in Canada is part of the water crisis on “Very large crane”, say researchers

The water share between Canada and the United States has long been a controversial issue.

In 2005, the old Alberta Premier Peter warned against Lougheed Canada’s water supply sharing In conjunction with the United States, Alberta’s most important source was not oil and gas, but not water.

“We need to deliver how strong this is how strong it is to the United States,” he said.

Lougheed’s anxiety did not arise in a vacuum. A long history of water sharing proposals is radical than others.

The North American Water and Energy Alliance (NAWAPA), RIPLUBB, along with Canada, along with Canada with Canada through Canada through Canada through Rocky Mountain Trenches through Canada through Canada (NAWAPA).

Even if these suggestions come and go Some researchers Look like something like Nawapa’s “Zombie” project, always revive, never die. The real history of water sharing between the United States and Canada was less dramatic – managed by regular and bureaucratic, institutions, boards and contracts.

Thus, Donald Trump, as a candidate for the Republican president, Comments made In September 2024, there is a “very large tap” that can be opened to pour water from Canada to help water shortages from Canada.

“It’s a little inflamed nature for this,” he said.

“But I think it has a demonstration history … maybe the right word is ‘interesting’ on water in Canada.”

For water experts, there is a concern that climate change and the US policy change in border water contracts for a change of policies.

And the old infrastructure of the century does not help matters.

For example, in Montana, watering water from Saint Mary River via North Montana and South Alberta, some Canadian agricultural operators and irrigation with an Alberta society near the border. The repair of these siphons is already facing the US federal fund break breaks under an executive procedure.

A university with Saskatchewan water scientist, John Pomeroy, said that this issue is very worried about the place for three reasons.

The first does not meet the required requirements for water supply and management of water management regimes, ecosystems and people in North America.

“The second mountains of drought and glaciers change the main calculations based on the larger limit and loss of stones and glaciers, the basic calculations based on our water management,” Pomeroy said.

Third, the idea of ​​the conflict can take the water resources of another country and direct themselves to their own. …

“This is a century to solve problems. When these three come together, you can see items for the continental disaster.”

Burning the faucets

The issue always represents the political, economic and environmental problem, Peter Gleick said that the Pacific Institute has an co-founder of a California research organization aimed at climate scientist and water.

“New management, US-Canadian relations, tariffs, a little strange problem, all kinds of difficulties, a little strange problem,” said Gleick.

“As far as I know, the water has not yet entered the conversation on the United States … But now he knows what weird ideas returned to power.”

Trump, with water, Gleick’s appearance, this is a “weird attraction”, which goes well outside the external crisis and valves, including long charm with consulting water policy.

The latest Los Angeles wild firefighters, Trump, California Gavin’s escalation of Gavin Newsom for the Government, American cable news in the first administration of the American cable Newsmax accepted “Required” water “north.”

“You know in Canada and you are in the north. Through the Los Angeles … From the mountains, the mass among the mountains, the melting, the sum of the melting is in January.” And even in January, even in summer, a natural water flow. If they were so water, they did not know what to do with it. You would never be fires. “

The idea that water can be directed from Canada to Los Angeles would be technically very expensive and very difficult for the engineer. There are also great problems with invasive species and habitats along the way.

“I think with Trump, you see these wild assumptions, but the United States approaches a water crisis in many regions, including the southwest, and the south is near the water crisis,” Pomeroy said.

“At the same time, the climate change continues to warm up faster than the rest of the world in Canada. Our Summer is even dry, and this will apply severe water management restrictions by managing our water resources.”

It is not so simple to turn to a “very large crane”. Some do not see water placing water in the trade talks, including Gleick.

There are tensions that have tension over the years, but joint agreements have been sufficient to manage both countries for a long time and are avoiding problems.

To make sure, the work of these commissions cut for them.

Wild card? According to Gleick, this Trump said, really said that Canada wants.

“Then, this is becoming a political issue. The question is how this is managed?” Said.

Border-border operation

Alberta has a work research in the border in the border.

Two centuries of the east of the Glacier National Park near the Canadian-US border last summer. Those adjectives were a critical part of the dairy tea project, which provides water from the Saint Mary River via North Montana and South Alberta.

It follows the history of provocation 1909 Border Water Agreement The United States is obliged to send water to Canada between Canada and the United States.

In the United States, the Dairy River, located near the Canadian border, was forced to ban all the use of all unusual water, taking into account the natural flow of the natural flow of the city of River. At that time, the mayor of a small union called him “dry city – in the true sense of the word.”

The repair work continues in these siphons, although it recently hit a roadblock due to the “opening of American energy” disposal Issued by Trump management.

Jennifer Patrick, Leading Board of the Milk River, the Project Manager, the Credit of Montana provinces, but the main repair, but the federal money is frozen due to the execution order, he said.

Patrick said he believed that the break was part of the US government spending on many infrastructure projects. Other regional water projects that provide drinking water to rural areas are also held at the glance.

“Our finances are looking at it, but we are still convinced that the internal branch will put it in the process of reviewing and how we spend money on how we spend money.” “It’s a good project.”

The infrastructure is important for farmers on both sides of the border, and Alberta government says that the government is in close contact with the milk river, water coats and agricultural operators to support it possible.

Alberta Finance Minister Nate Horner during the last meeting The eye of the calcustHorner discussed investment opportunities and strategic advantages, which discussed the strategic advantages that can be seized by a new Tac Corporation that will monitor politics for the Heritage Foundation.

“I’m trying to think about things that are important to move on in the future decades,” Horner said.

“I think … Sounds in southern US, sweet water infrastructure, sweet water infrastructure, such opportunities.”

Its office then clarified that the water infrastructure was not active investment. However, the newly formed, the length of the legs of the legs can choose the investment in the capacity of the Foundation Corporation, which indicates an investment in the water infrastructure, so it was not saying open.

However, the repair and livelihood will be closely monitored by Canadians who trust him. And for some Canadian water researchers, the aging infrastructure and climate pressures are the importance of knowing that it can put pressure on long-term contracts.

“None of these agreements have been reopened and the infrastructure has been changed in this very dynamic time, the water supply and drought many counters or many divisions,” said Stadny, Canadian research chairs and hydrological modeling Department .

Canada is becoming more difficult to control the water with warm-up and dry climate change. Saskatchewan Water Alimi had to play a stronger role in the introduction of water scientist, and the growth and management of water requirements, especially in the government, especially in the introduction of the United States.

“There will be a big problem going forward … We must hold firm on the water, Canada water remains in Canada,” he said.