Trump’s regime is leading a “war against terror” against Tesla protesters, claims they have WMDS
The calendar can say 2025, but vibrations are becoming a lot of 2002 in the United States right now.
FBI issued a public service message Friday Concerning the attacks on Tesla dealers, asking the public to be vigilant as a result of at least nine known incidents in which people have shot unaspanied Tesla vehicles and have thrown Molotov cocktails into empty buildings. Another incident on Monday included suspected ignition devices found in a dealer in Austin, according to KxanS
The FBI’s statement is a surprising development, but General Prosecutor Pam Bondi really accumulated rhetoric on Sunday when he appeared on Fox News to claim that people who are carrying out these attacks had “weapons of mass destruction.”
“These are not isolated incidents, as you know, and these are not vandals,” Bondi told Maria Bartyromo. “These are Molotov cocktails. This may be a weapon of mass destruction that Tesla’s car dealerships.”
The term “weapons of mass destruction” is defined on the website of the Ministry of Homeland Security as “nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological or other device designed to harm a large number of people”. And if you want to stretch yourself, you might be able to make it a case that Molotov’s cocktail falls under the definition of WMDS, as there are so many different ways to determine the term under the laws of internal terrorism, even if most people usually understand WMD to be things like nuclear weapons and mustard.
But whatever the technical definition is, Bondi’s intention is clear here. She wants to use the same game book used after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to inspire fear of the population and justify a huge answer. In 2002, it is alleged that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had WMD, which in some way threatened the United States today, it is believed that WMDS against Elon Musk’s business.
Hussein had no such weapons, of course, but it was the president of the lie George W. Bush to justify the invasion of Iraq in early 2003, with a war that most Americans recognize today is unnecessary. It was a lie that worked, unfortunately, and this kind of fear of fear succeeded, because the general public usually believes that the mass events of victims are the species that imposes a serious answer.
And General Prosecutor Bondi is clearly preparing a huge answer, as she also made a step more at Fox News and suggested that Jasmine Crouquet, an outspoken Democratic Congressman from Texas, was in some way tied to “internal terrorism.”
“This is internal terrorism,” Bondi said. “And Maria, now you have this Congress Crocket, who calls for attacks against Elon Musk on her birthday. Let’s take him out on my birthday, she says. And yet she turns and says: Oh, I don’t call for violence. Terrorism will stop in our country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tduytv_nmnk
Croquette withdrew from Bondi’s allegations at MSNBC, telling the host Alex Vit on Sunday that she did not encourage violence while noting President Trump’s pardon for abusers who tried to overthrow the US government on January 6, 2021.
“I have never encouraged violence, but I have never apologized for those violent actors like those on January 6,” Crocket said, according to Daily beastS “So Pam Bondi, if you have a problem with terrorism, maybe you should talk to your boss about locking those guys, whom he released to participate on January 6th.”
The destruction of properties in Tesla dealers receives most titles, but there are also completely peaceful protests against Musk, which are getting much less attention. Entitled Tesla Takedown, the protests have jumped into almost every Tesla dealer across the country over the last two months. Protesters are upset by the destruction of Musk by the US government, something that continues, as its dogs are passing from agency to agency that cuts and burn things without understanding what they are eradicating.
Musk was not chosen, nor was he confirmed as a cabinet officer, and yet he acts as a type of Trump co -chair. Musk has repeatedly suggested that he himself has to decide what is worthy of funding, even if the congress is very famous has the power of the bag. Musk destroys entire agencies, as he did with USAID, despite the fact that Congress is the only entity that can legally do something so drastic.

Trump and Musk supporters also manifested themselves in these antithesized protests, including one person who tried to use a Stunning gun against peaceful protesters in Berkli, California, over the weekend.
Another incident saw a man in Palm Beach, Florida, deliberately driving her SUV into a crowd of protesters, apparently in an attempt to protect Musk’s honor or something. The crowd jumped out of the way and no one was injured according to Florida Local 10 News.
The protests are likely to continue in the future, as the selected Democrats as Senate’s minority leader Chuck Sumer refuse to face Musk and Trump in some meaningful way. Sumer voted for the progress of the Republican financing bill two weeks ago and there is nothing in return, something even Nancy Pelosi He pointed as ridiculous. And while the elected leaders like Sumer do not begin to behave as if we live through an emergency, protests in Tesla dealers are the only option that many Americans feel that they should express their disgust.
Trump and his group of abuses also insist that he will go after the “funding” attacks on Tesla dealers, despite the fact that the FBI has identified them as almost certain “Lonely violatorsS “
Trump to Tesla’s attackers: “They will have a lot of serious consequences because they are really terrorists when you think about it. And I think the people who finance them – very well they could be the people I know, the people you write about – but these people are in big problems.”
– Aaron Rupar (@Atrupar.com)) March 24, 2025 at 11:09
Things will get much more war on terror-ish in the days, weeks and months ahead.