Trump scores ‘unambiguous victory’ Pulitzer Award Board members deny the court’s refusal
President Donald Trump On Wednesday, a Florida Court of Appeal, the officials of the Pulitzer Award suspects unanimously confirmed the court’s decision to reject the president’s claim.
Trump, in 2022 in 2022 against the Board of the Pulitzer Prize, in 2018, the Election of the “Now Debunked Theory” allegedly arguing between New York Times and Washington Post in 2018. The appellate opinion determined that the Court of State was jurisdiction against non-governmental defendants and the statement in the center of this work took action.
“Today’s ruling is a unequivocal victory for the justice of the Pulitziter Prize for President Trump. President Trump, fake news to hold traffic and smear in traffic to a fair result” Quincy bird, lawyer for President Trump Fox News Digital.
Trump, Pulitzer Award Conducts a great legal victory against the Board members
President Trump, in 2022, the Pulitzer Award Board was sent to the National Report Awards against the New York Times and Washington Post in 2018 and the controversial “now debunked theory” reported in the Washington Post. (Photo illustration)
Judge Ed Artau, Trump overturned to win the 2016 presidential elections (Trump) and wrote a long consent to explain that the court agreed with the unanimous opinion.
“The President’s complaint, Special Consultant Robert Mueller, Prosecutor General, General Prosecutor’s Office, the Election Committee of the Intelligence, the President Trump did not have the evidence of the conference, as President Trump, as President, as President, ‘(T) Russia’s conference tried to ask for the defendants, the president’s want to assassinate the president “,” Judge Artu, Fox News Digital decided on a document received by Fox News Digital.
“I think the president’s long-term charter and four-thirds of the Fourth Amendment, which allowed the Private Processing Clause of the Non-Resident Defendants,” the referee continues did. “But I write a separate to resolve the president’s defamation and conspiracy claims, because non-resident respondents are not effective under the long-term statute of Florida. Thus, the essence of the president’s claims is very important for the jurisdiction and will be resolved in this opinion . “
The judge added that the Court of the Court of the Court has a personal jurisdiction of its non-resident defendants, which brought the operation of Twofold (1) (1) (1) (2) Said there are sufficient minimum contacts with non-resident defendants, Florida’s conspiracy theory (constitutional prong). “
The judge argued that the suspects argued by controversing the “president’s claims, not effectively influenced by the long-term statute, but not to be an effective under the pure opinion, though not one of the pure feedback did not make false impression. ”
Judge Artau explained that a statement came into action “It should be one more fact or mixed feedback than to report pure feedback.”
‘Debunked’ Rusy Honorary Decree to defend Pulitzer Award-to-layer
President Trump, Pulitzer Award Case filed a defamation claim, New York Times and Washington Post rewarded for Russia in 2018. (Donald Trump 2024 campaign)
“The statement here could not result in both procedures, both Pulitzer Awards and the National Report, the 2018 Pulitzer Award and the awards were informed,” he said.
“Members of the Board, including the 2016 presidential elections, including Special Adviser Robert Mueller, including the Debunction of all reliable sources, including the presidential election, the Privitentist Source Committee and US Senate Selected on Exploration Selection Committee “Judge Artu. “Therefore, the statement of the issue was one of the fact or mixed opinions, and the result is a claim for slander, Florida’s long-term charter allows for the implementation of Jurisdiction.”
The judge noted that the law of Florida recognizes the conspiracy of the jurisdiction.
“When the Court of Justice concluded the proof of the proofs, the President met with the burden to prove that his load could be carried out on non-resident defendants.”
Judge Artau, the Landmark of the Supreme Court New York Times v. The Sullivan’s verdict is canceled, but the understanding of the first amendment should continue to be a land law, despite the original evidence that public figures can sue for the defamation. “
“The president met with the burial of the jurisdiction to continue his burial of the non-resident defendant’s truck, or not to act with real evil or carelessness or ignoring the truth. They rejected their claims about the approved publication. “
New York Times and Washington Post launched a narrative narrative of President Trump’s Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2016. (Reuters / Jorge Silva)
Pulitzer Rewards did not meet immediate commentary request.
The lawsuit was called “fake connection and basic” demonstrated and marked “for the coverage of the prestigious award.
Times and post staff, the national report for the national report for the National Report for the 2018 National Report, Russia’s intervention in the 2016 presidential election and acute the concept of research with him Trump CampaignPresident of the president’s transition group and end of the president, “According to the Pulitzer website.
“A large sumball of Americans, time truths and the spread of the media dominated by the media of the Russian Confection Hoaks,” said. “It was very much awarded to lie to the American community.”
The complaint made a number of points that the stories winning in the Pulitzer Award could be honored, including the fact that it could be honorable Special Advice Robert Mueller We could not find the general report of the DOJ inspector, which is aware of the evidence of confusion and malfeazans by federal investigators.
Previously, Trump’s team called “a full and fair amendment, apology or withdrawal,” 2018 rewards were canceled, but the Pulitzer Award board, announced the stops of the award.
“Pulitzer’s award-winner is carefully considered the complaints against the winning entries and carefully reviewed the Pulitzer Council, including Former President Donald Trump, including New York Times to US Elections The presentation of the Washington Post – the 2018 National Reporting Award, which is connected with the participation of Russian intervention and Trump campaign, “Pulitzer wrote earlier.
This last legal victory comes to heels ABC News ’15 million dollars solution and a $ 25 million settle with Trump in the last weeks of methane. CBS News Paramount Company Paramount, the network’s high stakes of the network are announced to end the legal war against Trump. Trump also filed a lawsuit against the DES Moines Register and Veteran Polster Ann Selzer.
The fight against the members of Pulitzer, Trump’s Chief Adviser Boris Ephtay is one of the many legal frontages, offenders and citizens associated with Ephtay.
Click here to get FOX News app
FOX News Digital’s Joseph A. Wulfshn has contributed to this report.
English