Trump NIH and FDA nominees are aimed at the dispute of a new scientific journal related to the debut
President Donald TrumpNational Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Governance (FDA) are part of a group of scientists who fight for a new research journal, scientific discussions and “Gatekeep”.
The magazine, a magazine, called the magazine of the Public Health Academy (Jaf), includes an editorial staff of several scientists complaining about censorship during the Covid-19 pandemia.
Jaf’s co-founders include the first Martin Kulldorff Harvard Medical School Professor, who is a companion established in the Academy of Science and Freedom of the College of Hillsdale, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Health Policy at Stanford University in Stanford University. Kulldorff and Bhattacharya, the author of the Great Barrington Declaration, the Great Barrington Declaration wanted to resolve the predominant medical society, Covid-19 reduction strategies – is better than good that people faced by people in a long run.
CDC employees explained to delete the terms’ duo, ”: “All”, public health material
Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, the next director of the FDA, is also the editorial staff of a surgeon and public policy.
Stanford’s doctor Jay Bhattacharya, Left, Dr. Johns Hopkins University. It seems together with Marty Makary. (Getty Images / Fox News)
Jafe, peer reviews from other magazines that do not present to the public, adopt a new approach to the implementation of prominent investigations. The effort was directed to the scientific conversation, Kulldorff, in a paper that announces the goals of the magazine’s creativity, he said.
The magazine will not disclose the “open access” to the public, and the editorial administration of the magazine will not be able to prevent all scientists in the network “Gatekeeping” to prevent any potential “
“Scientific journals He had a very positive impact on the development of science, but in some ways, “Kulldorff said. Kulldorff said. “After reviewing the historical and current problems, the new academic publishing model was offered – reviewers of open access and a serious consideration of private work with important work and public confessions and published their research in the timely and efficiently scientist lets do. “
Kulldorff, Bhattacharya, Makary and others complained about the leadership group of the new magazine Covid-19 pandemia censored. These were often opinions that contradict the advantages of the widest medical community related to the vaccine effectiveness, natural immunity, locking, locking, locking, locking and other issues.
.
“Great technology All kinds of sciences on natural immunity, “SIC),” SIC), “Makary, after the Pandemia, said in the Congress in Congress, the most discussed research in 2022,” Censored. “
“I am specifically targeted for censorship by the COVID-19 constraints and federal government officials,” Bhattacharya said in his statement in his statement for Congress for the same year.
Kolldorf, who complained of the censorship of the Kovid-19, claimed that he had applied for the truth to “stick to the truth” in Harvard, Covid-19 lock and vaccine since 2003.
Conservative law firm, ‘Censorial regime’ begins to probe to five major universities
Dr. Martin Kulldorff Old Harvard Medical School Prof. (Getty Images)
“JAFN will provide quality through open peer-feedback, but new and important ideas for new and important ideas for the formed orthodox” Andrew Nomer, JAF, gave Fox News digital information.
“To draw an example, the infectious disease has a very little scholarship in our epidemiology, the origin of Sars-Cov-2, the virus caused by Covid. often worried about thinking about the damage. “
Click here to get FOX News app
Bhattacharya and Makary did not want to express the attitude to this article.
English