The United Kingdom Parliament chooses not to hold AI companies responsible for copyright materials

The Ministers in the UK Municipalities Chamber have blocked a change in the data bill that will require AI companies to disclose the use of copyrighted materials, S This change in transparency was devoid of the text by referring to something called Financial Privilege, a mysterious parliamentary procedure that suggests that all new provisions will require a new budget.

The United Kingdom official website “It can be used by Commons as a reason to cancel any proposal for the House of Lords, which has consequences for cost.” This seems to have happened here, as those in favor of eliminating the repair increase the cost of a potential regulatory body. There were 297 MPs who voted in support of the removal of the amendment, with 168 opposed.

Chris Bryant, Minister of Data Protection, said he acknowledged that this could be felt as an “apocalyptic moment” for creative industries, but in his opinion the change in transparency requires changes “in the circle, not just in parts.”

Change earlier this week. Baroness Beyban Kidron from the masters answered today’s move, saying that “the government has failed to respond to its own asses, who have repeatedly asked” Is it not now, when? ” Ai. Lady Kidron continued to accuse the government of resolving “theft on a scale” and coziness “of those who thieves.

“Throughout the creative and business community, in parliament, people are removed that the government is playing parliamentary chess with its livelihood,” she concluded.

As expected, Kidron will introduce a prefected amendment before the return of the bill to the masters next week. This creates another reflection when the bill returns to Commons for another pass.

Owen Meredith, CEO of the Media Association, told Guardian It is “extremely disappointing that the government has not been able to listen to the deep problems of creative industries, including news publishers who are so fundamental to uploading our democratic values.” He accused the government of using a parliamentary procedure to “reject the industry’s fears instead of using this timely opportunity to introduce transparency, which would lead to a dynamic market to licensing the extremely valuable creative content of the UK.”

The preferred government plan involves reading a refusal clause. This will give AI companies for free to take advantage of any content, except when the creator has explicitly refused.

Hundreds of artists and organizations last week In order to summon the government not to “give out its work at the request to a handful of powerful technology companies abroad.” The artists involved in this campaign included Paul McCartney, Elton John and Dua Lipa.

America is ready to host its own version of the game show “Give everything to AI Companies.” Republicans have crept into a budget bill provision that For ten years. This will do well.