The survey finds 75% of scientists thinking of leaving the United States

A poll of the nature of more than 1,000 scientists has revealed that 75% of them are considering leaving the United States due to the uncertainty caused by the decrease in the Trump administration by federal and university funding.

Since Trump’s second term began, he has reduced the funding of universities and federal agencies research, which is believed to have potentially impeded the country’s ability to move the needle for scientific discovery.

The recent poll shows that the actions of the administration can also impede the country’s position as an oasis for scientists fleeing uncertain or outspoken hostile attitudes abroad – the Nobel Prize winners Albert Einstein, Nils Bor and Enrico Fermi, among many other scientists who who flows to the United States As fascist governments increased across Europe in the early 20th century. As the recent poll shows, the freezing effect can cause a brain Because researchers in the field are looking for more green pastures elsewhere.

According to natureThe numbers he wanted to leave were even higher among researchers at the beginning of their careers, such as PhD students and postgraduate researchers. As the survey shows, 548 of 690 (79.4%) of post -documents think of leaving, and 255 from 340 (75%) weigh the solution. “Europe and Canada were among the best elections to move,” Nature says.

Many researchers who Talk to nature He pointed out that they did not want to leave the United States, but the administration’s attitudes made it clear that there would be better opportunities for research abroad.

Earlier this month, the University of Ax Marseille in France said That several dozen US scientists have responded to his call, offering a safe port to Americans who want to leave the country. The researchers who expressed interest were from institutions, including Stanford, Yale, NASA, National Health Institutes, among others.

The second Trump administration has scientific goals firmly in its crossed hair. The administration has been reporting since January National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist), the Food and Drug Administration (Fda), the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) and National park (Nps) and reduction of funding in a broader stream of institutions and programsS

Assuming that the best intentions – only as a thought experiment, so stop your disbelief – the administration tries to optimize the government by reducing the wasteful costs by making US agencies and institutions as effective as possible in its pursuit of detection.

You can now relieve yourself of these optimistic reflections. Government directives have caused the effectiveness of these institutions, according to experts who spoke with Gizmodo, and risk canceling years of progress at home and abroad.

But some of the cuts are also made in accordance with Project 2025a conservative movement that strives aggressively cut back on environmental protection in the name of freedom and personal freedoms. So, while some of the redundancies are taken from the bottom row, they are also in lock with the ideological framework of the administration.

The Trump Administration is this month is Given the reduction in funding For the internal efforts to prevent HIV – to return the frankly authentic program that Trump outlined in his first HIV term, the aim of eradicating the virus internally by 2030. It is not clear who has been swung with the Trump administration, but they obviously have a contagious attractiveness.

Funding changes occur in locking with cultural shifts summoned by the administration, especially through the White House’s desire to Disassembly Programs and language advocating for diversity, justice and inclusion (DEI), which have become a lightning rod in conservative circles such as Bugamman, representing the Wake Up program.

Last week, Nasa Watch First reported that NASA’s “Sanitary Sanitary” has Removed graphic novels From the agency’s website to tell the fictional story of the first woman walking on the moon. No woman has never walked on the moon, although the artemis’ missions will change – though it is now less clearly If this is the agency’s priority.

If the United States wants to maintain their height as a bastion of scientific discovery, he must show the bright and beginner minds that they have the opportunity to build their careers and become leaders in their fields. For the past few months, the Trump administration has distracted them from this idea and seems to continue with its program full steam forward.