The Pentagon sent a warning against the use of a signal just before Fiasco’s chat from the Yemen group

The Pentagon warned not to use a signal in a note only last week, according to NPR. He cites threats from Russian hackers.

The memorandum was delivered throughout the department days before the Atlantic Ocean publishes a bomb discovery that its editor -in -chief Jeffrey Goldberg had been wrongly added to chat by the signal group This included detailed discussions about planned hits on Huti’s rebels in Yemen, including the name of an undercover operative agent of the CIA. Members in the alert chat included US Secretary of Defense Pete Heget and Vice President JD Vance, among others.

In his warning of a note against the use of a signal, the Pentagon writes: “Russian professional hacking groups use the functions” related devices “to spy on encrypted conversations.”

As the name implies, connected devices Allows signal users to enter their account from multiple places, and incoming and outgoing messages appear on all devices. As the signal is encrypted from end to end and the messages are stored locally only on encryption -key devices, the company first includes all communications of the user in an encrypted package. Then using QR codes, users can send a encryption key along with the new device:

One encryption key sent from the main device to the new device does the job, loading a protected connection through which we can send encrypted data. It turns out that even a regular QR code makes a trick – the new connected device can display a QR code that includes all the necessary information to load the process and send encrypted data through a secure connection. Just scan the code from your main device to get started.

The Pentagon’s note states that hackers are able to circumvent this obstacle by creating malicious phishing pages or QR codes associated with group chats that users can send to each other as invitations. “After gaining access to a malicious code, the groups add their device as a connected device. This allows the group to view any message sent by the involuntary user in real time, bypassing encryption from end to end.”

Another such message application popular for private communications, Telegram, is used in both Russia and Ukraine, and is the purpose of Russian hackers, with a company that works directly with Kremlin offering A offering A offering a $ 5 million wealth For feats.

The signal has Protect your security practicesAnd they outlined the large lengths they took to prevent the company from accessing user data.

But at the end of the day, neither the signal nor the end -to -end encryption technology will protect anyone who shares classified plans for war in ChatS This is an app for user -class messages managed by a technical organization now Used for political communications Against the backdrop of major global conflicts. It was inevitable that the signal becomes a goal. Governments provide Safe Physical Rooms (usually known as SCIF) When classified information is discussed for a reason and there is also a reason why personal devices should not be used in SCIF. Consumer applications are intended to be easy and intuitive for use and users can be directed through means such as social engineering.

The White House Prescent Secretary Carolyn Levitt was in defense, trying to expose this last fire, posting again on the X on Tuesday to say that no plans for war or otherwise in the chat were discussed in the chat. The investigation of how a journalist for the conversation remains continues. Social media has already spread theories of conspiracy that Goldberg was deliberately added, but it is not clear what the motive would be to do.

Jeffrey Goldberg is well known for his sensationalistic rotation. Here are the facts of his last story:

1. No “plans for war” were discussed.

2. No classified material has been sent to the thread.

3. The White House lawyer service has provided guidance for a number of different …

– Karoline Leavitt (@presssec) March 25, 2025

Some of them criticized Goldberg, the Atlantic editor, for remained in the chat, as there was discussing sensitive information. However, it is difficult not to argue that Goldberg as a journalist was obliged to inform the public about gross incompetence at the highest levels of power. In addition, if everyone else in the chat has followed the correct protocol for classified materials, Goldberg would have no history to start because it probably would not have been invited to SCIF.