The alleged son of Jay-Z lent a helping hand to the accused of raping the rapper

Jay-Zsupposed son Rymir Satterthwaitehas publicly expressed support for the rapper’s rape accusers as the lawsuit against the music mogul continues.

In his statement, the 31-year-old extended what he called a “helping hand” to Jane Doe, who accused his alleged father and Sean “Diddy” Combs raped her at a party when she was 13.

Rymir Satterthwaite previously claimed his family faced years of intimidation and stress over their paternity suit against Jay-Z.

Talking to Sun USA, Satterthwaite once again weighed in on the Jay-Z rape case, this time backing up the accuser, accusing the rapper of bullying.

“You know, we support those who are bullied,” Satterthwaite told the publication. “You know, we always help her (whatever she needs) from our side or from our team, we are there for her.”

The 31-year-old told Jane Doe to stay strong in her legal battle with Jay-Z, just like him, even if she faces setbacks.

“We’ve been fighting lawyers, judges, celebrity cases and stuff for years, so I can say it’s been a struggle, but don’t give up,” Satterthwaite continued.

“You don’t always win the fight, but you always get up and try again, and you know it’s not the end of the world.”

Satterthwaite, along with his godmother, Dr Lily Coley, have previously spoken of an alleged conspiracy to force him to drop the case, including instances of intimidation and the fact that he was never tried for his claims.

As for the alleged intimidation incidents, Satterthwaite claimed he was followed, had his car shot at and had people drive onto his lawn at 4 a.m., according to a recent filing against the rapper.

While he didn’t directly blame Jay-Z or his crew for the incidents, he did say that the “pop-ups” at his home and “random shootings” only started after his affair with the rapper began.

The 31-year-old’s godmother then highlighted their claim that Jay-Z conspired with the judiciary to strip them of their “constitutional rights” and prevent them from presenting their case in court.

“(We) never had a trial, never had a hearing, never had a day in court. Everything was pushed out, pushed out and silenced,” Kohli said. “And that’s why we’re fighting because it’s more about constitutional rights.

In a previous interview, Cowley discussed how Jay-Z’s ongoing rape lawsuit could mark a “day of reckoning” for the rapper’s career and the music industry as a whole.

“And that’s why you have to be careful how you treat people and what you do, because I believe you will reap what you sow,” Kohli said. Sun USA.

Cowley also believes the latest allegations could “spill over” into their own case because it “shows a larger narrative, a larger scale of what’s going on, and that it’s deep and broad.”

However, she did not provide any further explanation as to how she thinks this will play out or whether she has been contacted by the rape accuser’s legal team.

In the same interview, Satterthwaite shared that he was not motivated by fame or money to file a paternity claim against Jay-Z.

“I’m not really trying to chase you to get fame or money from you. I don’t want anything from you. I’ve always said that,” the alleged son told the publication.

Satterthwaite continued to express his anger that the case had dragged on all these years.

“You guys went and dragged it out. You have not given us proper justice for many years,” he said.

He also noted that the case had caused “harm” and “stress” to him and his family, while stressing that they were only seeking “the truth” and not trying to hurt anyone.

In the documents received Fox News DigitalJay-Z’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, has expressed concern that the rapper’s accuser could destroy evidence in their case after the alleged victim admitted to making mistakes in her accusations.

As part of the filings, the attorney urged the court to compel the anonymous accuser and her attorney, Tony Busby, to “preserve all evidence relevant to this case.”

Jay-Z’s lawyer also poked holes in the alleged victim’s case, citing mistakes she made in her allegations during interviews.

This includes Jane Doe’s claim that the assault took place at a private residence, which Jay-Z’s lawyer says does not exist.

“These admissions make impossible the timing, location and occurrence of the events alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint,” Jay-Z’s attorney also wrote in the documents. “Combined, the factual inconsistencies, failure to meet deadlines, and lack of corroborating evidence render Plaintiff’s allegations . . . wholly unreliable.”