Ryan Ryinolds, who is accused of “gas” Justin Baldon with joking “Snl50”

Since then, the joke has become viral on social media after this event, and many people call it.

The reports also state that Justin Baldoni’s lawyer is likely to use a joke against Blake Liveli in court because their legal battle is heated.

During a special “SNL” 50th anniversary, Reynolds sent social media Abuzz when he seemed to joke about the current hostility between his wife, Liveli, and her “ended with us” by a joint Baldon star.

Now a source close to the situation has shown that it is felt that the couple “gasped” Baldonia all this.

According to the insider, the joke seemed to be challenged on the previous claim to Lively about the suffering of grief, anxious anxiety, as well as injuries as a result of the fall of sexual persecution and slander of the director.

They also claim that Baldoni’s lawyers are likely to joke during the trial as Achilles’ heel to weaken Laila’s charges.

“It will be used against them,” the insider said Daily mail About Hollywood.

They added: “It’s not laughing, and Blake is talking about how it was traumatic and how it affected her mental health, but she can still threaten, show and laugh. This sends mixed messages.”

As you can see now in a viral video from “SNL50”, Ryinold’s joke began with him when he stood during the cabbage with the owners of Tina Fay and Amy Poler to ask a question.

When the hosts noticed him, they asked, “How are it?” To which the Dedpool star threw: “Wonderful – why, what did you hear?”

Many then widely interpreted this remark as a nod on the current legal hostility of his wife with her “over with us” co -authored and criticized it as a bad taste.

Social media users also noted that Kevin Kostner, who was sitting behind Reinold, was noticeable, with a grimace on his face to react for a moment.

One person wrote: “Ryan Reynolds and Blake Livel is the way Kevin Kostner tells.”

Ryinold’s joke comes after his wife has taken new steps to get “receipts” to help her prove that Baldon allegedly started a smear against her, per Term.

Immediately after the director shared his own version of the breakdown of his workers on the site, the actress sent summonses on the relevant parties seeking to receive telephone records, which will be used as evidence in court.

Subpons were aimed at Cell Cloudflare and AOL, as well as from the Jed Wallace, a crisis consultant who was charged with launching a “digital army” against actress at Baldoni.

In response to summonses, lawyer Baldoni Brian Friedman called them a “large -scale fishing”, which proves that the actress and her representative “desperately seek any actual basis for their proven false claims”.

“They ask each call, text, data log and even real-time location information over the last 2.5 years, regardless of the sender, recipient or subject,”-even further showed that Lively, noting that Lively will find nothing to prove her allegations.

Since the lawsuit, Lila against Baldoni, the director has strongly denied these claims.

He also filed a $ 400 million defamation lawsuit against the actress, which was recently amended to include additional requirements.

Meanwhile, both alive and Baldoni were warned from public commentary on the current case of the US District Judge Lewis J.

The court is scheduled for March 2026, but it can be postponed if the war between both sides continues to increase.

While Baldoni’s lawyer showed that the actor is “financially” and “emotionally” devastated by his legal hostility with the living, the source showed that the actress and the husband were not too good.

According to TmzThe insider said the duo of the couple remained in a “strong tug” against the background of his legitimate bustle from Baldon.

The source noted that the lively “emotionally fastened” from the current number of lawsuits from Baldon and that the case took on her “deep emotional fee” on her and Reinold.

However, the news also reports that the star “gossip” remains confident that it will become victorious and seeks to “make it all fasten” because it believes that the whole case is a “side show”, invented by Baldon and its legal team.