Ready Gibraltar claims to win in his legal war with Ready Makers Inc.

In a continuing battle for blockchain, the Gibraltar Supreme Court has lifted Freezing order worldwide Against a finished Gibraltar – a legal action that was caused by Civil warS

The Ready Gibraltar, run by the executive, Christina Macedo, has been repelled against legal claims that have previously led to an order to freeze Gibraltar. The tokens were frozen for three months until the courts settled the issue. Beyond the case itself, this civil war probably simply confirms the skepticism that many have around Blockchain’s games as a legal mess.

Representatives of Ready Makers Inc. David Benahum, Scott Rup and David Gilo were judged to stop the release of Ready Gibraltar’s Play“Tokens and related assets. Macedo in a press release claims that the Gibraltar court confirmed it as CEO and founder and the only legal and beneficiary of the finished producer (Gibraltar) Ltd. (” Ready Gibraltar “).

In the meantime, Macedo acknowledged that the dispute affects the price of the marker, and since the company relies on the tokens for financing, the price collapse means that the company should release people.

Play, Onchain’s infrastructure platform, said the solution eliminates the restriction on $ Play Token operations and allows the team to remain focused on product delivery and ecosystem growth.

In a A 32 -page decision, issued on April 17 (Neutral citation 2025/GSC/0172) The court of the court John Retano has released the order after finding that the plaintiffs have no “real prospect of success” and that “neither” Bennahum nor Bitkraft are entitled to the Agreements on tokens. ” He also pointed out a critical omission: Ready US-the Delware Entity, which the plaintiffs relied on to justify their own right over the finished Gibraltar and the $-have been compatible since March 2023 and have been dissolved since March 2024.

In addition, the court found that the freezing order had become “depressing”, contributing to a sharp decline in the price of the $ tokene, which affected approximately 19,000 detained portfolios.

Play’s defense was led by London -renowned James Ramsden CC, a lawyer who stopped Craig Wright’s unsuccessful lawsuits against crypto builders.

“This is a saline lesson for the plaintiffs engaged in digital disputes for assets that fail to engage with a clear understanding of technology and its special vulnerability to traditional intermediate orders. It is also a timely reminder of what is happening to the plaintiffs with the gts of the court and her processes with the care and her processes. And the honesty he has the right to expect, “said James Ramsden CC at Astraea Group, in a statement.

Public prices data show that the market capitalization of Token Token has fallen from about $ 100 million in advance lighting to about $ 3.4 million at its lowest point in March 2025, affecting early supporters such as Delphi Digital, Spartan Group, Polygon Ventures.

The order was locked on February 4, 2025 (diverse February 20, 2025). Another hearing on April 25, 2025 will determine the cost of compensation due to play, Macedo said.

The answer to Ready Makers Inc. of Ready Gibraltar

In a statement Bennahum said:

The recent decision you are probably referring to is the decision of the Gibraltar Supreme Court on April 17, which released temporary The freezing order we received in February against Ready Maker (Gibraltar) Ltd. and his assets.

It is important to understand that it was no A final decision on the merits of who rightly owns Gibraltar or win. This was a solution specifically whether this specifically Temporary The measure should continue at this stage, waiting for complete experience. In fact, the judge himself acknowledged in his decision that there is a “serious question that must be tried” about the basic property dispute that confirms the essence and legitimacy of our basic claims, even while managing the provisional order.

We strongly disagree with the decision to raise the protection of the assets of this critical moment, in particular given the disturbing state of the company under the guidance of G -Ja Macedo. The estimate of the Gibraltar ready trajectory market is great: the value of the tokens of the game has dropped from its launch and more clearly that the volume of trade has virtually stopped – Coinmarketcap has only shown about $ 70 traded throughout the 24 hours preceding today. This demonstrates a deep lack of confidence and activity on the market in current controversial control.

In addition, beyond these market indicators, the company’s operation is deeply concerned. We have received reliable reports from former staff, who suggest that D -Ja Macedo may have ended all the operational staff, leaving itself as essentially the only person. This raises serious questions about the company’s ability to function, store value, or conducts any “ordinary business course” and contradicts any story that it is necessary to raise the business continuity order. (Macedo confirmed that the cuts were held at Ready Gibraltar).

This worsening situation emphasizes poor management and the significant risk to the company’s assets – the assets we wanted to protect. He enhances why we believe that our immediate legal actions are needed. We filed an appeal notice against the whole decision on the same day it was submitted (April 17). At the same time we filed an emergency application to the Court of Appeal in Gibraltar, who asked them to remain Disposal of the original order or grant a Order Under the same conditions specifically to preserve the assets frozen and preserved Awaiting the result of our appealS

Our main position has not changed: Ready Gibraltar was created by Ready Us, using ready -made US intellectual property and significant funding from our investors, especially to serve as our marker vehicle. We maintain that I d -Macedo and the related countries have wrongfully conquered control over this entity and its assets. We are struggling to restore legal control and guarantee that the assets are reserved in favor of Ready US, its investors and the toke holders who have invested on the basis of the original vision and structure.

We are confident in the merits of our case, validated by the court’s own finding of a “serious question that must be tried” and we pursue vigorously appeal.

Dispute background

The dispute arose at the end of 2024, when Benahum (a former Macedo consultant, but former Benahum CEO), RUP and Gillo demanded additional fully concluded 20% of Tuker’s supplies for $, although they have no legal claim, Macedo said. When Play refused, they submitted parallel actions to Gibraltar and Delaware and received the current freezing order while publicly questioned the legitimacy of the tokene.

In the last four months, Macedo has said the game has documented coordinated traditional media and social media campaigns from Bennaahum and others, in its community channel Discredting the game team and discouraging the token sides, Macedo claims.

“From the first day, the game acts with transparency and in the best interest of our community. The court of court restores clarity on our community and partners. We make this statement to adjust the recording and maintain the reputation of the game, our team and after months of fake and misleading.

Ramsden added: “This is a decisive revenge on Christina Macedo and Ready Gibraltar. It is also good for Gibraltar, as the leading jurisdiction of digital assets in Europe. The challenge for courts everywhere applies analog legal principles to the digital assets. The choice for this sector.

Next steps

• Toke management: The green $ Play tokens will be transferred back to the portfolios for a lot of PLAY signing until April 25, 2025, Macedo said.
• Damage: The game will pursue damage to reputation and financial harm, Macedo said.

Macedo said the game remains committed to creating an onchain ecosystem, which democratizes access to Web3 games for developers, players and creators. The company calls on Community members to extend factual reporting and to counteract residual misinformation.