Rachel Zelarir labeled “Ungrateful” by John Lennon’s son over “White”

John LennonSon, Sean Ona Lennon. Rachel Zelarir.

The singer called Rachel Zelarir “disabled his brother”, claiming that he was “not surprised” that the film was on the box office.

A lot of the expected live activity “White” Disney has been at the center of heavy disputes since its unsuccessful debut.

The film, which is reportedly worth the north of $ 250 million to produce, only at a disappointing $ 43 per weekend, almost half of its goal of $ 85 million.

The son of John Lennon, Sean, has now shared his question with a bizarre and pointed rampant on social media aimed at Zegler.

In the remote tweet, Lennan meant that the criticism aimed at Zelarir “went too far” but was not shy to further render the actress.

He wrote: “I agree that Vilification has gone too far. But it also acts as a spoiled ungrateful and disabled brother. So it’s not surprising.”

Lennon’s note came under the topic in which he discussed Zelarir and her beauty galu.

“Both the galo and Rachel Zelarir are exceptionally beautiful women. Some of you are mistaken,” he said, according to Daily mail.

Then the singer replied to her tweet: “Some people say,” But beauty from the inside. “This is not the beauty that makes you model, acting or even body folding.

He continued: “You can do a lot to help in style and personality, but nothing will receive, for example, you, for example, if you do not have good genetics. Let’s not infant, physical beauty is not from the inside.”

User X replied that Lennan defends Zelarir: “Both actresses are good performers, but Zelarir does not deserve the variety and many” folk boys “constantly give her.

This comment pushed Lennan to call Zelarir “a tainted ungrateful and disabled brother.”

Zelarir, who became aware of his role in “Western History” by Stephen Spielberg, collided with a significant reaction after her cast as a title character in “White Snow White”.

Some critics claim that her casting deviates too far from the original display of the character, and many branding him with another copy of the Hollywood agenda.

The 23-year-old actress also cut her animated predecessor in 1937, rejected the themes of true love and prince of magical as “strange” and outdated.

“She is not going to escape the prince, and she won’t dream of true love,” Zelarir said in an interview, calling the prince “literally a stalker” Daily mail.

It is reported that the Remake has encountered a number of disputes in the field of his release.

In August, Zelarir seemed to leave the Disney team, bewildered while promoting the film when she mixed her political views with advertising positions.

At the time, she thanked the X supporters for 24 hours to 120 million views from 24 hours before 120 million views “and always remember free Palestine.”

According to Variety. Zelarir’s comment on Palestine scored more than 4 times more views in the original position, leaving Disney executives who are deceived to manage the blow.

The Disney leader expressed concern about the studio with the Zelarir team, while the film producer Mark Platt flew to New York to talk directly to her.

“She did not understand the consequences of her actions, as far as the film meant for Galya, for whom,” the source said.

Three months later, after the presidential election, Zelarir posted “F-CC Donald Trump” and “Can Trump fans … never know peace” on Instagram.

Meanwhile, the son of John also criticized Zelarir, accusing her of detrimental to the film by his social media messages when he defended his father from Internet criticism.

The commentator called his father Jonah “horrible as hell” and stated that the efforts of the producer on control of the social media of Zegler were “not credited”.

In response, Jonah wrote: “Do you really want to do this? Yes, my dad, producer of a huge fragment of Disney IP with hundreds of millions on the line, had to leave his family to fly around the country to say his 20-year-old employee for dragging personal policies into the section of the movie to pay the advertisement. “

Jono continued: “It is called responsibility and responsibility for adults. And her actions clearly harm the movie box. Freedom of speech does not mean that you are allowed to say everything you want, in private work without consequences. Tens of thousands worked on this film, and it touched the conversation on your own immature desire in the risk This movie did not talk to her own immature desire, risking his colleagues and crews and blue collars, which, depending on this movie, which, to do what his own slowly, risks to his colleagues and blue workers.