People who are good in controlling the conflict do this 1 thing

Rate this post


When I approach conflictMost people aim to take their way and others try to find a common place. This is a mistake author Robert Bordone and Joel Salinas say.

In their new books, “Conflict Disidici:” Negotiations are negotiating without refusing to give two arguments or refusal to resolve the conflict.

“We think the conflict is more likely to increase the conflict and in fact,” Bordone said. Harvard Negotiations and Mediation Clinical Program is the creator and former director.

People who are good in the navigation conflict do not think the disputes are bad.

There is an unusual disagreement that it is impossible to solve

Joel Salinas

Behavioral neurologist and clinician scientist

“If the direction of what you entered is so negative, it is more difficult to be more than anything else and I have a more accurate frame,” Bordeage says.

In fact, they see it as an opportunity to confirm the other person’s side. Instead of coming with the list of points, they prioritize and ask questions.

“The case of being a confrontation continues enters a scriptine landscape because the other person is motivated by the feeling of interest in something,” Bordone said.

New York University, a behavioral neurologist and Clinician Alimi Salinas know whether and in their workplaces, and sometimes it can sometimes be expected to look.

“It is impossible to solve that there are certain areas of disputes,” he says.

A conversation is not ‘chances of collecting points’

From a bridge, other man’s fears, other people, Kurt Gray, North Carolina University, Chapel Hill and author, why you should try to understand why we are moral and policies and politics and politics and politics and politics and politics and politics and politics CNBC said it did it early this year.

“So we are going to these conversations often and talks,” says he says gray. “It’s a chance to collect points or try to make the other person look stupid. The real conversation is something you ask.”

Gray recommends taking three steps to make better conversations when someone is disagreed with:

  1. Try to understand their motivation: Ask the question and express the results with true interest as they come.
  2. Confirm this motivation: If you do not agree with their point, you can confirm that you are there.
  3. Highlight your personal connection: Instead of peppering them with the facts, be sensitive and tell them why you think about them.

Others, unlike some statistics, unlike some statistics, unlike some stats, are more likely to find some dignity in your argument.

“By making a connection with someone, seeing them as a man, I think this is a long way,” he says gray.

Both of you, at least if you try to understand each other, you both feel better and more respectful.

Want to make a little extra money on the side? Take CNBC’s new online course How to start the side haste Learn tips for strategies for success from other and the best side of the rush specialists. Sign up today and use Earlybirde for an introduction discount at $ 97 (+ Taxes and Rights) on April 1, 2025.

Plus Sign up for CNBC Make a newsletter Here, get tricks and tricks for money and success in life.

I moved to Paris after bankruptcy in the United States - I am very happy now
 
Report

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *