Opm Watchdog says,

Rate this post


Thehe Personnel Management Service The acting general inspector confirmed that the independent office was investigating whether any “emerging threats” had arisen as a result of a result of Elon Musk Interference Operations introducing rapid changes to protected government networks.

“OPM OIG (service of the General Inspector) is committed to providing an independent and objective supervision of OPM programs and operations,” writes the Chief Inspector, Norbert Vint, in a letter Doned on March 7, to democratic legislators, adding that his service is not only to check the OPM security check, but routinely is based on “risks development”. The letter states that the service will fold specific requests issued by democratic MPs last month in its “existing work”, while launching a “new commitment” on the potential risks in the agency related to computer systems that were accessible or modified by the United States service.

A screw whose predecessor was fired by Trump in January is one of half a dozen deputy generic inspectors summoned by the Democrats In the Committee of the House of Supervision and Government Reform last month for investigation Wired reports and other retail outlets Regarding Dodge’s efforts to gain access to a wide range of record systems that host some of the government’s most sensitive data, including millions of government staff files and their families.

“We are deeply concerned that unlawful access to the system can happen in the federal government and can pose a great threat to the personal confidentiality of all Americans and the national security of our nation,” Gerald Konoli wrote in a letter on February 6.

In addition to OPM, Democrats have pressed similar security assessments in five other agencies, including the Ministry of Finance, the General Services Administration, the Small Business Administration, the US International Development Agency and the Ministry of Education. However, VINT is the only guard of any of these agencies who have responded so far, a commission spokesman told Wired.

While in the minority in the Chamber and the Senate, the Democrats have little power to carry out effective supervision beyond the official hearing that must be convened by the Republicans. During his first term, the Ministry of Justice of Trump has issued guidance informing the executive agencies that they have a zero obligation to answer questions from the Democrats.

Congress Republicans have committed themselves a little, if any, official supervision of Doge’s work, and instead selected back-channel with a billionaire because of the effects of his anti -perzon crusade.

The executive order for the establishment of a Dodge, signed by the President of his first day of service, instructed federal agencies to provide Musk operators with full and quick access to all non -classified recording systems to achieve a state cleaning of “fraud, waste and abuse”. However, it became clear, however, that Dodge employees, many of them young engineers With direct links to Musk’s own business, they paid little attention to key defense confidentiality; leak, for example, Mandatory evaluations From new technologies installed in protected government networks.

“Several of the concerns you have expressed in your letter for a letter on issues that OPM OIG appreciates as part of our IT annual reviews and OPM financial systems, and we plan to include these problems in these existing projects,” VINT wrote in the March 7 letter. “We have also just started commitment to assessing the risks associated with new and modified information systems in OPM. We believe that in the end, our new commitment will deal with many of your questions related to the integrity of OPM systems. “

 
Report

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *