Only fans judges two dudes who suddenly realized they might not talk to real models

Two men from Illinois have filed class action Against Smut’s global pedals, only Fans only, after reaching the ego aware that the messages they receive as a result of their subscriptions may not actually come from their favorite sexual workers.

404 media Originally reported Concerning the court dispute, which was filed on behalf of his two claimants, M. Bruner and J. Fry. The lawsuit is striving for Fenix ​​Internet, LLC and Fenix ​​International Limited, the mothers of the mothers of the platform and accuses them of increasing a huge “fraud” against users of the site. “The plaintiffs claim that the defendants illegally and incorrectly mislead and deceive their fans, allowing third parties to send communications on behalf of the creators in violation of TOS only to Fans,” the case said. It also indicates:

Despite the fact that the success of only Fans is built on a promise of “direct” relationships and “authentic” relationships, only Fans deliberately facilitates the schemes in which fans are deceived to pay to have personal interactions with creators who are not “authentic” at all. These schemes include a deceptive outsourcing of the fans’ interaction work, as well as with other functions, with “management agencies” of third parties.

Gizmodo turned to only Fans for comment.

It’s Well -known fact The fact that many only Fans models do not really talk to their subscribers. Prominent media have been covering this phenomenon for years, and I have always imagined that most subscribers know this about business. As Bruner openly admits in the lawsuit, he subscribes to a model that had hundreds of thousands of followers. Only on the basis of pure common sense, what are the chances that a lady like this has time, resources or, more importantly, the will to answer directly to all the messages of her fans?

Only Fans is also ahead with regard to the potential involvement of third -country companies in customer exchanges. Actually the platform A “contract” Among the “creators” and “fans” states: “The fan admits that third parties can help the creators manage their accounts in the interactions of the creators.” The implication here seems to be apparent, but the case of Bruner and Fry claims that this contract “applies the role that third parties can play in supporting the creators with their content”, since the contract for a fan-creator is “invested within TOS, requires additional action on behalf of a fan only, and is indicated only in terms of use of hyperlink use. which requires a fan to visit to refer only to the conditions of using a hyperlink requiring a fan to visit to understand only in the conditions of use it requires from a fan to visit to refer only to the Hyperlink use requiring a fan to visit.

Roughly translated, the case seems to say that the fact that the contract is on a different TOS web page and thus requires the user to click from one page to another is unreasonable. Yes, how can you be expected to read carefully and understand the service conditions of the company when you are so hungry for the “authentic connections” that you can have with Starlets advertised on its website? This is a good question, but it may not really be the problem of the company.