old emails haunt Mark Zuckerberg in high-stakes trial

Rate this post


For the most serious anti-blending challenge in the history of Meta, Mark Uck Wishberg’s protection had little to do with the technology giant this week and had a lot of contact with Tankk.

Within three days, the billionaire technological founder has repeatedly stated in Washington to the US Federal Court, which has increased the video platform belonging to the Chinese parental sector, becoming a huge opponent.

His competitor’s falsifications had the purpose. Federal Federal Charges Meta Preserved illegal monopoly, charges that

Lose the case, and the meta may be forced to break his $ 1.5tn group and rotate his Instagram and whatsapp programs – result Uckerberg He previously promised to “go gray and fight.” Win, and it will turn into a decisive victory over the regulator that has long had large technologies in its sights, then recently the retail giant Amazon is more important.

The trial comes after Uckerberg failed to negotiate first of all. According to the person familiar with the case, FTC has demanded $ 30 billion as a possible solution. Meta LowBalled raised $ 450 million $ 1 billion, after the regulator set $ 18 billion. At that time, the parties decided to move to court.

Man is manually loaded with a hand truck loaded with
Wednesday documents are taken out of court © ALEX WONG / GETTY Images

FTC costume claims that the Meta is working for a “coordinated strategy” to eliminate competitors, including competitors to Instagram and WhatsApp, respectively $ 19 billion.

FTC lawyers presented evidence of Uckerberberg this week that see these news applications as a threat, including uncomfortable e-messages. Uckerberg 2012 It has agreed to make suggestions that Instagram’s transaction can help “neutralize” the opponent, “Meta is” M & A. ”

But such a tactic would be only illegal if FTC can prove first of all to prove that the meta maintains a monopoly, the argument, which says that they are antitrust experts. It’s a point that Zuckerberg and Meta CEO Sheryl Sandberg focuses on their testimony, emphasizing the explosive growth of Tiktok to serve more than 1 billion users.

“What they said and thought in the past, it’s not a great look, but it doesn’t have a great experimental value, if the meta now maintains the monopoly,” said Humanland and March Pau Svans.

“Zakerberg and Sandberg have done a good job, explaining why it’s current reality – [that] Tiktok and Meta have an involvement of each other and replace each other in most of the users’ minds. “

FTC must also prove that it caused consumer damage, which will be monopolistic prices as a rule. Meta offers free, the agency argues that consumers are experiencing the degraded user experience due to the sovereignty of the platform and poor privacy protection.

The main challenge of FTC will be convincing the presiding judge James Boyasberg that partially prevails through achievements, a “personal social network” market, which is focused on friends and family.

Sheryl Sandberg
During the trial, Meta CEO Sheryl Sandberg testified during the trial © John Lamparski / Getty Images:

The person near the settlement talks, who first reported Wall Street magazine, said that the low level of metal has shown how weak was the FTC case. FTC refused to comment.

“We are not ashamed to explain why it is a case for FTC, which demands to prove something that knows every 17-year-old in America.

But some experts claim that Boasberg, who utter a few words all week, can be receptive to FTC arguments.

“The court is obviously open to the possibility that there is a personal market market,” says Kenneth Duter, a partner in Krofel and a competition group. He cited 2024, in which Boasberg said that FTC had “met with his cargo to show that other applications for families” and other applications for families.

Uckerberg rejected this idea in court, pointing to a group that rushes to develop reels – short form videos. TIKTOK’s suggestion “Probably [been] In the last few years, the highest competitive threat to Instagram and Facebook has, “said Uckerberg.

Meta Boss also argued to WhatsApp and Instagram was acquired to speed up their growth, pointing to the sharp jump of users following transactions.

FTC reversed the 2013 e-mail. By mail, Uckerberg argues that “the biggest competitive vector for us is for some company to communicate with a broader social network.”

After graduating, Teach Sandberg to Teach Catan Residents of Catan, Zakerberg in 2012.[Facebook] Messenger didn’t beat whatsapp, Instagram growing so faster than we had to buy them for $ 1 billion. This does not kill a number of a number. “

“The confused part of Mark’s testimony that he tries to contradict the statements that he fulfilled a decade ago, as these achievements are in real time,” said the Heads for the “Anti-Monopoly Non-Commercial” Economic Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom.

Perhaps the most pronounced evidence came in the form of Zakberg’s email in 2018, where he considered to rotate from Instagram – Citing threat of anti-monopoly tax on anti-monopoly tax today.

As “large technology companies are growing,” he said.

 
Report

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *