Nominated on “Oscar” Timothy Chalamet finds new fans on the Hulu’s main charts

As a child from Minnesota once sang: “Time they are changes.” After its initial theatrical issue in December 2024, Bob Dylan Biopic “Full Unknown” became available on VOD in late February. Then, on March 27, it was available to transfer Hulu to the subscribers of this service. As of this writing, Currently the movie is the number one on the main chartsWhat makes it the most visual movie in the service right now.

Advertisement

Usually this should not be too strange. Hulu has long been connected with Disney studios and 20th centuries, maternity companies distributing “complete unknown”, and most of the releases of the 20th century/spotlights work well at the service. In addition, the film became a very loud release, becoming a little rival of dark horses during the awards last season. Especially it happened for the star of Timothy Chalamet, who won the best actor for his image Robert Elena Tsimerman, aka Bob Dylan at the Actor Guild Award (where he made a speech for a strong conversation) and was nominated by several other reward bodies. Including his second nomination for “Oscar”. Given the capture of the Chalamet in the pop -culture, in the acting of the deep bench, his attractiveness of the biological period, and his main character is one of the most famous and revered musicians of all time and peoples that the “complete unknown” will become a great draw.

Advertisement

However, viewers who discover it only after the Hulu release reflects the shift in the field and observation of the viewers about what we all know, but still hurt. Although the “full unknown” ended quite well for itself, it amounted to $ 134.8 million against the $ 50-70 million budget, which is not a hit box, which is even more evidence that viewers are not in the movie theaters that they ultimately ended.

It is fair to say that, probably, no one, not even the directors, thought or even hoped that the “full unknown” would be a blockbuster of the Avengers. It was not designed to be and was not sold as such. In fact, the marketing campaign it received was the one that was based on almost only around its prestige and called for the awards of the voters, which is the approach that makes sense, given how popular the biopes are usually with this group. However, it seems that the bulk of the discussion around the “complete unknown” is concerned about what the film can make for its acting and crew, and less about the content and attractiveness of the film itself.

Advertisement

Perhaps this is the reason why the “full unknown” could not cover the box office during its original theater release. While the movie never lagged, he only almost hacked the top -5 during the run, debuting in No. 4 and never reached a higher position. Of course, there are many elements that take into account such a performance – things that suffer from the whole entertainment industry and are too complicated to consider in detail here. Suffice it to say that if the viewers were better off the film, perhaps there would be more interest. If there was more interest, the movie may have received a greater release (it only played in 2835 theaters, just over half of the 4100 theaters that Disney gave it “Mufas: King Leo”) And perhaps there would be a bigger blow.

Advertisement

The fact that the “complete unknown” seems like a real hit on Hula, supports this hypothesis, just as it confirms the constantly disturbing truth: thanks to the reduction of theatrical windows, the audience is learning to wait for the broadcast instead of catching movies on the big screen.

But don’t let me be a dilans contract. In general, fantastically, more and more people are revealing “complete unknown”. The film is an example of sterling, which is engaged in a major studio of Hollywood film production. Despite the fact that spotlight images (which, of course, I initially ask for the Fox spotlight before buying Disney), it is allegedly the hand of the studio to create and/or acquire independent and specialized films, “full unknown” feels like the type of film that previously made a classic Hollywood. This may be partly intentionally if co-authored/directed by James Mengold covers the film of the 1960s.

Advertisement

However, the film is not a stylistic exercise at the superficial level or retro-dominance, especially compared to the work of Mongold. The filmmaker demonstrated an acute sense of craft from his first few films such as “Heavy” and “Police Earth” and even his Genre work as “identity” and “logan” Contain justified quality that supports the more funny aspects of these films. The most modest way to demonstrate what makes “complete unknown” so special is to compare it with the previous musician Mangold, “Walk The Line”. Last movie “Story Johnny Keshe and June Carter “Go hard: Dyui Cox history.” Despite Johnny Keshe’s presence, the “full unknown” does not resemble a “walk on the line”, which is as clear as any one that Mongold is a responsible director (see also: the difference in tone and aesthetics between “Wolver” and “Logan”).

Advertisement

Despite some negative reviews, throwing it out as a regular biography, the strengths of the “full unknown” lie in their intelligent, well -thought -out, but unobtrusive film production. Mangold is the type of director who knows where to put the camera if, and not one to impose a movie style that overlaps other aspects of the film (the smallest of all actors). In other words, he knows how to make everything work at a concert. “Full Unknown” is a film that has a quiet fantastic art in it, and though it is a shame that it is no bigger strike after its theatrical release, at least it is also a movie that will not be forgotten.