NIH’s financing cuts seem to refer to the Foundation Foundation’s report that they blow up “Dei staff”

The 2022 report includes an analysis of 82 universities, the indirect cost of costs received from federal grants, and the indirect cost of costs they receive from private funding, such as Sloan Foundation, Gates Foundation and the Chan Zuckerberg initiative. Ten of the schools in the analysis of the Inheritance Foundation did not confirm their indirect costs for private funding, leaving 72 full participation in the report of the report.

Of these 72 universities, the report claims that 67 have accepted private research grants with a zero percentage of indirect coverage of the cost of research – exactly the same analysis and detection as in the NIH news.

Do you have advice?

Are you current or former NIH employee or scientist who has been affected by this administration? We would like to hear from you. Using a non -working phone or computer, contact our signators securely at Mattreynolds.45 and Emullin.06.

The Foundation of Inheritance Foundation has come to the conclusion that only three schools in the sample refuse to accept indirect percentages of private foundations of lower interest rates than those who have agreed with the Federal Government. These schools are the University of Alabama in Birmingham, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Michigan.

The NIH news refers to the same three schools without identifying the Foundation for Inheritance as a source of analysis. It mentions that Harvard requires a minimum of 15 percent indirect coverage of costs from private funding and that the California Institute of Technology requires a 20 percent coverage of indirect costs. These examples also appear in the report of the Inheritance Foundation.

One of the authors of the report, a senior research associate of the Jay Green Foundation Foundation, says he did not participate in the preparation of the NIH news, but admitted that a paragraph of the NIH news “seems to be a reference to our 2022 report. “NIH did not respond to Wired’s request for comments.

A plan to reduce the percentage of indirect costs in the federal grants also appeared in the 2025 project, near the Second Presidency of Trump. “This market reform would help reduce the subsidization of left -wing federal taxpayers,” the report said. During his presidential campaign, Trump has consistently disabled any relationship with the Inheritance Foundation and Project 2025.

On Monday, a 22 -state coalition He filed a case challenging the legality of NIH’s attempt to reduce the indirect costs.

Universities say the cap will prevent their ability to do vital research. “The opening of new treatments will slow down, the training opportunities for the next generation of scientific leaders will shrink, and the science and engineering capacity of our country will be highly compromised,” writes writes, “writes,” writes writes Harvard President Alan Garber in a publication on the university’s website.

Some universities have a loss of more than $ 100 million federal funding if the new grant border is maintained. According to to StatWeill Cornell Medicine brought $ 107 million in indirect spending in 2022 – a figure that will drop to $ 23 million if the percentage was 15 percent.