Justin Baldon’s lawyers say

Justin Baldoni.
Sony Pictures releases /courtesy of Everett’s collectionJustin BaldoniLawyers in scape Blake is aliveA legal team when they are looking for telephone records against the background of their permanent legal drama.
According to the court documents received US WeeklyOn Friday, February 14, on Friday, February 14, a letter to Mitchell Shuster, which represents the 41st Baldoni, and its production company Wayfarer Studios, was sent.
In the design of the documents, Schuster smashed the Lively legal team for issuing a summons for several cell phones looking for documentation for calls or text messages “belonging to each of the individual parties,” and “different non -partisan people”. Shuster claimed that Lively lawyers demanded “call logs, texts, data logs and information about the location of the cell site.”
“It is difficult to overestimate how wide, invasive and atypical these summonses. These are civil lawsuits, not criminal prosecution, and live parties are not FBI,” the letter said. “However, the subpoena are looking not only for the full call history and text of each of the goals for several years (regardless of the sender, recipient or theme), but also for the same period, information and data in real time and data logs. reflecting, among other things, the history of the web -sa “.
Shuster claimed that this step “grossly” exceeds “the corrected opening sphere.” While the Baldoni team does not object to the use of third tools to identify both parties, they advocate what is being done in “legally permissible”.
“Wayfarer’s parties are deeply concerned that living parties are intimidated by third parties providing information about our customers (and different riots), far beyond what is suitable (or even legal) in civil lawsuits, including the Information, Prosecutor, Prosecutor -Client of Communication and Location In Real Time Mode, among other things, ” -wrote Schuster. “Full summons is a flagrant abuse of the detection process and, if it allows you to stand out, set a precedent that – if their blurring dissipate – we are sure that the lawyer of the living parties will not be ready to accept when it comes to the opening sphere and communication Customers.

Blake Liveli.
Images NDZ/Star Max/GCBaldoni’s legal team stated that they “Punged” by Lila Above the sub -settings, but the parties “could not resolve the dispute”. Schuster asked the judge to weigh “very sensitive to the time”, as some “cellular suppliers have already noted that they intended to fulfill summonses.”
Alive, 37, and baldoni legal battle started after the couple starred in the 2024 movie It ends with us. In December 2024, a lively lawsuit against Baldon, accusing him of sexual harassment, emotional suffering and much more. Baldoni denied allegations and filed a $ 400 million lawsuit against her husband, her husband, Ryan Ryinoldsand her publicist Leslie Slovan.
Us confirmed on Friday that the Lila team was put in court on telephone records About the producer of the movie “Baldoni” Jamie Hit and Uefore Studio Steve Sarovitz in an attempt to find evidence of a smear against the actress.
“The telephone records belonging to all the individual defendants will expose the full network of people who participated in the brain campaign against Ms Liveli,” Lively said in his statement. “Such records will give critical and indisputable evidence not only about anyone, but also about when, where and how their revenge plan gathered and acted.”
Baldoni Brian Friedman’s lawyer told us in response that “summonses is a common part of the trial.”
“Extraordinary what live parties are looking for. They ask each call, text, data magazine and even real-time location in the last 2.5 years, regardless of the sender, recipient or subject,” he stretched in the statement. “This large -scale fishing expedition shows that they are desperately looking for any actual basis for their proven false claims. They will not find any.”