Hugging Person sends an open source plan, a challenge for major technology in the fight against White House AI policy

In landscape of policy in Washington, increasingly dominated by calls for minimal AI regulation, Hug It makes a clear different case of the Trump administration: the development of open source AI and jointly can be the strongest competitive advantage in America.

AI platform hosting more than 1.5 million public models in different domains has submitted its recommendations for White House Ai AI Action PlanArguing that the latest breakthroughs in open source models demonstrate that they can correspond or exceed the capabilities of closed trading systems of some of the costs.

In his formal submission, the embrace of the person emphasizes the latest achievements as Olympicoderthat outperforms CLUDE 3.7 on sophisticated encoding tasks while using only 7 billion parameters and fully open to AI2 Olmo 2 models This Openai match O1-mini Productivity levels.

The presentation comes as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to collect a contribution to its upcoming AI Action Plan, a mandate from Executive Order 14179An officially entitled “Removal of Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence”, which was published in January. The order, which replaces the more regulated approach of the Biden administration, emphasizes US competitiveness and reduces regulatory barriers to development.

Hugging Face submission stands in complete contrast with those of commercial leaders of AI as OPENAIWho lobbies a lot to regulate a light touch and “freedom for innovation in national interest” while warning China’s narrowing of AI’s capabilities. Openai’s proposal emphasizes “the voluntary partnership between the federal government and the private sector,” not what he calls “the excessively burdensome laws of the state.”

How could AI AI AI AI of America: A hugging of a triple threat strategy of Face

Hugging Face’s recommendations focuses on three interconnected ladder that emphasizes democratizing AI technologies. The company claims that open approaches are improving and not interfere with America’s competitive position.

“The most modern AI systems so far are on a strong basis of open research and open source software – which shows the critical value of the constant maintenance for opening in maintaining additional progress,” the company wrote in its submissionS

Its first pillar requires an increase in open and open AI ecosystems through investment in research infrastructure such as National AI Research Resource (NAIRR) and providing wide access to reliable data sets. This approach contrasts with the emphasis of Openai on copyright exceptions that would allow their own models to train on copyright -protected materials without explicit permission.

“It has been shown that investments in systems that can be freely used and adapted have a strong economic impact, multiplying the effect, leading to a significant percentage of the GDP of the countries,” noted Hugging Face, arguing that open approaches increase rather than prevent economic growth.

Small, faster, better: why effective II models could democratize the technological revolution

The second pillar of the company focuses on dealing with the restrictions on the resources that AI adopters face, especially smaller organizations that cannot afford the computing requirements of large-scale models. Supporting more efficient, specialized models that can work with limited resources, Face’s embrace claims that the United States can allow a wider participation in the AI ​​ecosystem.

“Smaller models that can even be used on EDGE devices, techniques to reduce computing requirements from the conclusion, and efforts to facilitate medium-sized training for organizations with modest to moderate computing resources all support the development of models that meet the specific needs of their context of use.”

Regarding security – the main focus of the political discussions of the administration – the eruption of the person makes the counter -intuitive case that open and transparent AI systems can be more secure in critical applications. The company suggests that “completely transparent models that provide access to their data and training procedures can maintain the most extensive safety certificates”, while “open weight models that can be executed in air environments can be a critical component in information risks management.”

Big Tech Vs. Little Tech: The growing political battle that can shape the future of AI

The Face’s embrace approach emphasizes growing political units in the AI ​​industry. While companies like OPENAI and Google Underline the acceleration of regulatory processes and reducing government supervision, the risk capital company Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) is advocated for the middle ground, arguing for the federal leadership to prevent the patchwork of state provisions, while focusing the regulation on specific damage rather than the development of the model.

“Little Tech plays an important role in strengthening America’s ability to compete in AI in the future, just as historically, it was the driving force of American technological innovations,” A16Z wrote in its submissionUsing a language that is somewhat consistent with embracing the arguments of Face democratization.

The submission of GoogleIn the meantime, it focuses on investment in infrastructure, in particular on dealing with “growing energy needs” to implement AI – a practical concern shared within the industry positions.

Between Innovation and Access: Competition to Influence on the Future of AI of America

As the administration weighs competitive visions for AI’s AI GuideThe main tension between trade progress and democratic access remains unresolved. Openai’s vision for AI development gives priority to speed and competitive advantage through a centralized approach, while embracing Face presents evidence that the distributed, open development can produce comparable results while spreading the benefits more wider.

The arguments for economic and security are likely to be determined. If administration employees accept the claim of Face’s embrace that “a stable II strategy must use open and joint development to stimulate the best implementation, acceptance and security”, an open source can find a meaningful place in the national strategy. But if concerns about AI capabilities in China dominate, Openai calls for minimal supervision may prevail.

Clearly it is that AI action plan It will set the tone for years of American technological development. As the presentation of Face’s embrace, both open and own systems, has complementary roles to play – suggesting that the most wise policy can be one that uses the unique strengths of each approach rather than choosing between them. The question is whether America will lead to AI, but whether this guide will bring prosperity to few or innovation to many.