How the UK’s welfare cuts will change claimants’ lives

The British ministers have featured a feature for the radical reforms for patients and disabled, including 5 billion drams to spend on health benefits, and the plaintiffs’ new liabilities to deal with job support programs.

Liz Cendal, Secretary of Labor and Pensions, said Changes: People with disabilities will provide “same rights, elections and opportunities, like everyone, while keeping support for those who could never work because of the severity of their conditions.

But analysts say that if the government is promoting, about 1 million people will disappear from Bekan’s workforce deputies, but only a small share will enter.

How will the current system change?

The government wants to ensure that the benefits have plans to work on a financial incentive, make it much better support to help you find a job and not work if it doesn’t make it.

This will mean to capture the “Working Capacity Assessment” for trained inoperable benefits and the assessment of all plaintiffs to the “Personal Independence Payments” – the main disability benefit.

The idea is to demolish financial support from people’s work status, but the change will mean that some people lose their competence.

There will be a new “try” work with a guarantee that it does not have a “her or her own” re-evaluation or loss of benefits.

There will be a new duty to make incapacity benefits to join regular “conversations” to know about jobs available to themselves with potential sanctions if they are not engaged.

The government also wants to promote the basic exchange rate of unemployed benefits and reduce incapacity to solve what “perverted incentives” calls.

But it will add only 7 pounds a week to the standard of unemployed operating unemployed in the Universal Credit System, from 2026-27 to 98 pounds. At the same time, the UC’s health element will be given 47 pounds per week for new plaintiffs, and together with young people from the age of 22, except for advice.

The biggest change is a significant tightening of the competence of disability benefits. Changes in individual independence fees will mean that people only qualify for his “daily living” – 108.55 pounds per week.

Who will lose?

In general, there will be less financial support for people who have a wide range of health conditions, having a lot more harsh compeives for new plaintiffs and some of the benefits of the existing benefits when their requirements are reassessed.

There will be a modest stimulus, from 7 to 2026-27 a week.

But Luiza Murphy, for the Resolution Foundation, believes that the “small achievements” will be “completely shaded” on a scale of the income lost by them.

From 800,000 to 1.2 million people will probably lose their competence for PIP, he said.

Stepan Evans, Chief Executive Officer of the Training and Working Institute, said that overtime, up to 1 million new benefits may receive 2,000 pounds a year, as they will receive an item related to UC today.

Young people can be especially difficult if they were excluded from the reduced pace of health-related health support through UC, Murphi said.

How many changes will the taxpayers save?

Candal said that taxpayers will save tax payers from “More than 5 billion” to 2029-30, when they had imposed a conservative, Osbor to impose the severity.

He said that without any changes, the government will hold more than 70 billion, inability and disability benefits in five years.

Officials say that the pipe cuts will take most of the savings, but the green paper does not give any breakup.

Instead, the Budget Responsibility Office will assess the government’s expenses, when new fiscal predictions will be published in the next week’s spring statement.

Analysts say that OBR will make it clear that the savings will make it possible to materialize the pipelines and inoperable benefits that depend on consultation. The fiscal guard is skeptical of bringing people’s workforce to more speculative savings.

But Tom Waters, Associate Professor of the Institute of Fisciplinary Studies, warned that the package’s fiscal consequences, such as the previous well-being reforms, will be very uncertain, as people will change their behavior.

It would now be a much stronger stimulus to insist that any way of getting any benefits related to such health, he said, and tightening the competence for the pipe could simply change the assessment.

Reforms will help people at work.

Policy analysts say you need to work back to work to improve employment support, but their effect can be canceled with cost accompanying reductions.

Assistant to the Director of the Investigator-Tank of the Health Foundation David Finc said that the need for “trust” with people with disabilities.

Temporary research director of the disability policy Male Verapat says that the well-being will be reimbursed by increasing pressure on NHS, as people were looking for alternative support and legal expenditures.

The previous experience suggests that only two years more than two years of work is a small part of their job due to the return of health problems, even on the spot.

Waters have been warned.