Horror movies that horrified the director of Exorcist William Friedkin

Two years before director William Friedkin made a splash with an “exorcist”, he made an unforgettable Neo-Noir thriller. The 1971 “French connection” has a gloomy, direct feeling, and, although it is full of sharp sensations, the reflection of the basic topics feels honest. Friedkin captures the bureaucratic nature of the fight against crime, which often goes hand in hand with the most contemptible form of prejudice, which spreads to all losses of society. Each of these deeply rooted moods are woven with the border driving intensity that ends One of the most intense, exciting sequences of the chase, which, when -were treated for the movie. This natural dexterity for the amazing skill paid off every right way in your next movie “Exorcist” who is mostly considered the standard for the obvious, vice horror In the demonic genre.

The horror brand of Frykin’s “exorcist” It is more difficult than what promises the main reputation of the film. Yes, the 1973 film is designed to scare and shake, cutting the uncomfortable, exaggerated portrait of demonic storage, but it’s also much more. Friedkin presents us with the interior of Regan (Linda Blair) before she starts leviting or spinning head all over the road.

A regulating, lone child who strives for asylum in art to do her best from her situation, and not so much friends. Since her bright eyes once begin to look cloudy, and she begins to feel terrible and confusion, the value of fear is revealed to us. The endless was afraid that her mother Chris (Ellen Burstin) was experiencing how she sees her daughter – these are nightmares, because no father could never be ready to protect her children from such incredible evil. But Chris insists, doing everything that can even if all hope is lost. Friedkin presses this unconscious fear unable to help a loved one when they spiral, transform and eventually become unrecognizable.

Given the deep understanding of Friedkin horror (and its many shades), what films from the genre managed to scare him? Let’s see.

In an interview with ViceFriedkin told about the reason that he returned to horror throughout his career, emphasizing the ability of the genre to post “movies about high intensity about heroes who have a back on the wall and nowhere to go.” This has led to talk about movies that did It is scary:

“Movies that horrified me is a Japanese film” Psycho “,” Psycho “called” Anibaba “(1964) – one of the most horrific films I saw. And I liked this recent movie” Babaduk “. I was surprised and I considered it. “

While “psycho” and strangers are classic horror proposals that cause completely different types of terror “,” Anibaba “uses a medieval situation to emphasize every excess humanity that can be designed through a lens that cools and delights . Better understood through this last choice as “Onibaba” is a taste acquired Even for the most ardent horror fans, his bottomless shoot is too strong. In view of this, the horror of the film is more pragmatic than fantastic as “Babaduk” that causes something sensitive, introducing it into the experience of a realistic script. When authentic and surreal mixed horrific horror names are often produced, as well as the “exorcist” of Friedkin, which blooms from this duality.

The lack of authenticity can ruin even the most good horror movies such as “The Guardian”, which Frengin came in 1990. Although filling the potential, the movie is a powder that lacks the impact of its famous horror horror title. Moreover, the story is completely leaning into the “evil dead” coded horror, but lacking ingenuity (and gut) to remove it. However, Friedkin returned to his love for the horror based on realism in his psychological horror, which is as anxious, intense and claustrophobia, as you might expect from who did the “exorcist”.