‘High risk’ UK carbon capture projects face funding cuts

Open the Editor’s Marking Free

Rulla Khalaf, the FT editor, chooses its preferred stories in this week’s news.

The British field is against carbon capture and storage technology after the warnings from the deputies warned that the “high risk” policy should be re-evaluated to “be available to taxpayers and consumers.”

Treasury will be severely turned into Carbon capture Projects with the review of this year’s expenses, according to the people, the ministers, admitting that they will not meet the ambitious target of new technology.

The government announced For more than 25 years, for more than 25 years, for the capture of 21.7 billion drams of carbon. In October, the money only went to two districts in Teesidide and Merseyside, leaving the projects in a Humber and Scotland in one queue.

According to the captain, these other schemes are likely to receive a short reduction in a short period of time. government The numbers who say that the treasury was pickled with a source of technology.

It comes as a Commons for public accounts, who say that the government’s support is “unsurpassed, the first good technology” and warns that taxpayers did not endure successful.

Carbon capture and warehouse include carbon dioxide traps, as produced by clicking it and pushes it underground, sometimes decayed oil and gas reservoirs so that it does not. There are questions about whether CCS technology is commercially and practically viable on a scale.

PAC Rolling, CCS, will have a significant impact on consumer and industry electricity payments “and urged ministers to assess whether it would be available to the costs of living wider pressure.

The government said that 21.7 billion pounds for projects will be funded by a mixture of energy reports and treasury financing. It aims to attract another 8 billion private investments.

Sarah Jones, the Minister of Energy, said that by 2030 the annual conservative government’s CCS target “cannot be reached.” In his letter to the committee, Jones accuses insufficient funding by Torories.

Carbon capture projects are inspected by Rachel Riekes, Chancellor and Secretary General of Treasury Darren Jones, as part of all state expenses, ended in June.

One person who presented the mentality of the treasury said: “People will have to realize that they will not be able to do all things in the first term. There will be no fiscal wrapping enough. They will look at things like carbon capture and storage. ”

Another treasury insid said that taking into account the very economic background in CCS. “We need to see if it works or not.”

Two people familiar with the program say that the field is looking for government leadership and makes sense, whether further CCS schemes will have a priority.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, Pac chair, said. He added.

Ed iliband, climate change secretary, champion carbon capture, but government insiders say that he sees that development Sipseell C Atomic Station as his supreme priority.

The ministers were promoted as the most important regional growth strategy for carbon.

In October, the government said that the first Merseysie and Teeside projects “grow growth in northwestern England and northeast industrial heart.”

In December, reeves said the financial times These green energy investments, including carbon capture, represented one of his “big bets” on the economy beyond the southeast.

Carbon capture suggestions are greatly intertwined with the future of the heavy industry, such as the Humber, according to three people who are familiar with the discussions between the energy sector and the government. “If you don’t do it with humil,” added one of the carbon captures, “You don’t hit the 2030 zero target.”

The Energy Security Department said:

“There is no way to protect jobs in our industrial hearts and to ensure the future of the Bightening of the British industry. The department said that decisions on future CCS deployment will be taken to “proper process.”