Heathrow braces for long journey to third runway

On Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reves has visited Britain to make the world’s best relationship in the world, as he announced his support for the expansion of London airport.

Reeves said the government wants the third runway in Heathrow, although it will last for more than a decade to provide more than direct expanses at Gatwick and Luton airports. The projects in Stansted and in the city have already been approved.

If delivered, Advanced Airports can handle 309 ml of passenger every year.

The scale of the projects shows how the airports and mostly international investors are betting, betting that it will continue to grow in the coming decades, unknown to carbon emissions.

“Chancellor is right to follow airports,” said Karen de, Executive Director of the Airport of the Trade Association. “By expanding the abilities will support growth. A number of a number and will not come at the expense of our stability goals. “

But industry experts have said that this scale will lead to serious challenges, including the need to transform the paths of flight to London to accommodate all additional planes, probably affect new communities.

The enthusiasm of the Chancellor also in the cabinet was also loyal to the Cabinet, who have been embracing the Great Britain’s largest infrastructure program for decades.

If it was successful, it would probably become more expensive flying from Heathrow, as the airport raises airlines, which are charged to compensate for the costs of building the runway.

Still, “Lek” partner Becoquer Beckom Bakom, who advised Heathrow, said that the new ability would be used.

“The London market struggled for some time to meet demand. A number of a number I think that investors can be comfortable that there will be a business for such demand, “he said.

The most serious challenge is likely to be the impact of the airport expansion on the UK’s carbon emissions.

“I find it a bit of a hard time to see how you can have a third runway in Heathrow and a significant expansion of flight numbers in Gatvik in Gatvik’s carbon budget” Heathrow. The airport has never offered a planning application due to the epidemic.

Making himself as a Chancellor who is ready to “make bold decisions on national stakeholders”, Reeves called on the Heathrow leadership to build this third runway.

Prior to the previous governments, the legitimate support for the contradictory project, Heathrow CEO Thomas Wolbe said that he believes that the airport would “sit down around the table.”

“We can trust the government, they can be with us for many years,” he said.

Woldbe said the airport would now be dust in 2019 for expansion, which was on the shelf in 2020. 2014 an energetic plant.

But few doubt the scale of political challenges facing the project.

At the beginning of this month, EDBAND EDBAND said that he would not give up if the third runway goes forward, what was capitulation by the enemy of the largest cabinet.

However, the scenes said that “Miliband” was “bright” according to the government, which is familiar with the situation. He was not one of the government ministers in his speech.

The other ministers of the government also unknown what had shown that he suddenly decided by Reeves a few weeks ago. “It was really a tremendous line about it, just for everyone in the treasury and everyone,” said about one person.

Some Whitehall officials even offered to jump to Prime Minister Sir Keyir Stars, who previously voted against the event to publish the project. He has so far avoided doing this, asking questions about the Prime Minister’s questions for the last week.

Despite Reeves’s Warm Western, one skepticism inside the government said that the procedure for the development of Heathrow should still pass strict criteria for climate, air pollution and noise.

“They still have to reach the same standards that they made 24 hours ahead of this statement,” they said. “There is a lot of way to run on it.”

At the same time, the long-term rival London, Sadicate Sadik Khan, said he was “simply not sure that every year you can have hundreds of thousands of additional flights in Heathrow without our environment.”

Ruth Cadbury, Brentford & Isleworth’s workforce, and the Chair of Choice of Transportation. The commission will now study the “How clear are the links between the expansion and growth of the airport?”

Cadbury said it was skeptical that the project could meet with the four tests defined by the government on climate change, regional economic benefits, noise and air pollution.

“Test is whether the project provides growth for Great Britain [businesses] As a whole, for nations and regions and does it. Not really, “he said.

In contrast, it insisted that the third runway would benefit the whole country.

Reeves claimed that the expansion was compatible with the government’s “Legal, Environment and Climate Debts”, as he pointed out technological progress, which could have paved “cleaning and green aviation.”

The aviation industry agrees that it can grow while dismissal. The zero 2050 published in 2022, Zero 2050, implies that the number of passengers can still grow while emissions fall.

To do this, it mainly relies on “stable aviation fuels” or SAFs, which are made of a variety of crops and use oil preparation. Industry estimates they can emit about 70% of less carbon dioxide on his life cycle than traditional aviation fuel.

But it is much more expensive than jet fuel and is currently only available in small quantities. The managers of the airline said that the industry would be significantly necessary to support the government to keep zero.

Colin Walker, in the research group of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Department, said that the government’s hopes, which will compensate for the stable aviation fuel, compensate the additional emissions of the Hytrowu.

“The third runway will raise the way of emissions that this fuel capability to compensate them,” he said.

At the same time, planning experts say that the Heathrow has been completely growth for decades.

“Heathrow would have to work really hard, and government decisions will be challenged on the way,” said Taylor Wession, Alistayr Watson, a partner and planning head.

“The only ones who win from this are lawyers.”