He was guilty of divorce because he refused sex. The European Court did not agree.

The couple was about thirty years together before divorce. He blamed him to hurt his work marriage. However, in 2019, the French court decided that he was guilty of his divorce after refusing to have sex with him.

The European Court of Human Rights condemned this decision on Thursday, and said that the decision of the French court violates the right of a woman’s personal life and autonomy, including his sex life. The decision has been a significant event by the women’s rights activists who have been concerned about French laws of marriage for a long time.

According to the decision of the Versaal Court of Appeal, it is guilty of divorce after the woman, which is known in court documents only as HW. His husband for years, the court said that his marriage was “serious and repeated violations.”

However, the European Court of Human Rights says governments have committed to fight domestic and sexual violence, saying that the existence of such a marriage obligation is contrary to both sexual freedom and the right to control its own body. “

Added: “The court may not accept that the government intends to agree to the future sexual relations, as the government offers.”

This was a symbolic victory of the woman who claimed that he should not be found guilty in divorce. Groups defending women’s rights called this decision on sexual violence and other forms of violence against women in the relationship.

“I hope that this decision will be a turning point in the fight for women’s rights in France,” he said in a statement that HW asked Delphine Zoughebi. “This victory is for all women who are abnormally and unfair proceedings that question the body integrity and the rights of personal immunity.”

HW and JC, documents were found to have four children, where his husband lived outside Paris and had four children together. In 2012, the woman began the divorce process, claiming that his attention was affected by their family’s career and his family’s life and his husband was “nervous, violent,”.

Her husband claimed that he was guilty of violating the marriage commitments in the French court, and defaming him with his charges.

In his statement, the woman expressed his health, including a serious accident and a serious accident and the disk. The French court has decided in his favor.

The French government defends the violation of the marriage debt in the European Court, he said that the issue of local courts and punished sexual harassment between the French law. The spokesman for the official Diego Kola, who represented the French government in court, refused to comment, but the French Minister of Justice of Justice of Justice referred to the short response of Gerald Darman.

“It is clear that we will go in the direction of history and match our law,” said Mr Darmanin told reporters. He said he would encourage deputies to discuss this issue.

The work of both parties is three months to send to the Great Chamber of the European Court, it can look for a final decision. After the issuance of one of the courts, the committee of the government officials on the member states of the court controls its execution. The European Court does not have an enforcement mechanism, but its decisions may refer to their laws to recreate their laws.

Conversations around mutual consent, rape culture and sexual violence in recent months in recent months, the terrible case of 51 men killed Gisèle was found guilty of pelicot sexually violating. Mrs. Pelicot’s former husband, Dominic pelicot, almost about ten, admitted that he had taken drugs and forced him and invites him to join him.

Another lawyer representing HW, Lilia Mhissen said that the decision should prevent the law from interpreting the law in a way that the women of French courts would force them to have sex with their partners. He called it “a great development for the right to control women within marriage, including women’s own bodies.”

Women’s women’s rights, the women’s fund, said that this decision was “faced with responsibilities.” He called on the government to review his judiciary and added that feminist groups warned that the concept of “the task of marriage” was a form of control and sexual violence.

“Marriage will not be identified with sexual slandy and should never be,” the group said.