Hacked Health FIRC HCRG has requested reporting by the “download” journalist, citing the UK’s court order

US -based independent cybersecurity journalist declined to comply with the UK court order, which was sought after taking into account a recent cyberatta in the private health giant of the UK HCRG.

The Pinsent Masons Law Firm, which executed the court order on February 28 on behalf of HCRG, asked for Databreaches.net to “download” two articles This refers to Ransomware attack on HCRGS

The law firm’s notification to Databreaches.net, which TechCrunch saw, said the accompanying order was “received from HCRG” at the Supreme Court in London to “prevent the publication or disclosure of confidential data stolen during a recent cyberat of redemption.”

The company’s letter states that if Databreaches.net does not obey the order, the site can be found with disrespect for the court, which “may lead to imprisonment, penalty, or to derive your assets.”

Databreaches.net, managed by a journalist who operates under the nickname, disagreeing doe, refused to eliminate the post and also Posted details about the disposition of blog post on WednesdayS

Disagreement, referring to a letter from their Covington & Burling Law Caffer, said they would not comply with the order on the grounds that Databreaches.net was not subject to jurisdiction of the UK disposition and that the reporting was legal.

The disagreement also noted that the text of the court order did not specifically indicate Databreaches.net, nor refers to the articles in question.

Legal threats and demands are It is not uncommon In cybersecurity journalism, as reporting often involves the disclosure of information that companies do not want to be public. But orders and legal requests are rarely published for risks or fears of legal consequences.

The details of the order offer a rare view of how the United Kingdom Act can be used to issue legal requirements to eliminate published stories that are critical or disturbing to companies.

The law firm’s letter also confirms that HCRG has been affected by Cyber-Ataka for ransom.

HCRG, known earlier as Virgin Care and one of the largest independent health service providers in the UK, confirmed on February 20 that it was Investigation of an incident with cybersecurity After the Medusa ransom gang claimed the violation, stating that it had stolen 2 terabyte data from the company’s systems. HCRG has more than 5,000 employees and covers half a million patients in the UK.

When reached by TechCrunch, HCRG spokesman Alison Clabacher said: “We can confirm that we have taken court action aimed at preventing the republic of all data available by the criminal group to minimize the potential risk to those who may be affected.”

“We are investigating the incident with the support of foreign specialists and will notify (and have notified) anyone who is affected as needed based on our investigation,” the HCRG spokesman added.

A spokesman for Pinsent Masons, the law firm representing HCRG, did not comment until the time of publication.

According to the legal request, Pinsent Mason quotes two publications published on Databreaches.net, who reported that the Medusa ransom band has taken credit for HCRG Cyberattack and that the criminal gang threatens to publish Ransmy The gang publishes several screens of the stolen data on her site for the dark expiry of the Web as proof of their claims.

Posts published on Databreaches.net contain Much of the same information that TechCrunch and other retail outlets have independently confirmed and reported.

According to disagreement, Pinsent Masons sent the Databreaches Domain Domain registrar, which in turn warned that Databreaches.net would be stopped web domain if the publications were not removed. Later, the domain registrar turned the course and refused to stop Databreaches.net, the disagreement said.

HCRG has not yet publicly disclosed the violation of its website. Disagreement said in Their blog post on Wednesday that in the absence of HCRG updates, much of the HCRG cyberattack details are covered by independent journalists, including the cybersecurity blog Suspectwhich broke new details about HCRG Cyberattack.

Disagreement said that the court’s order otherwise “would” prevent the public from understanding that the violation is seriously with many affected people “and” can open the door to the widespread censorship of journalists in the UK or elsewhere. ”

“Journalists with any connection to the United Kingdom can be sent via email orders demanding the past reporting of data stolen by UK subjects, or could be banned from any future reporting of any data stolen from the UK,” said the disagreement.