Germany began to vote for the historical growth of defense spending

Today, what happens, here will affect the future of Europe’s protection and the future support of Ukraine.

The German parliament has voted for the wishes of the Bundestag, the expenditure of the brakes. This can lead to a mass increase in military investment, because Russia earns in Ukraine and Washington, and Europe can not trust the protection of the United States.

“This voting in the Bundestag is entirely important,” Prof. Monica Schnitzer, chaired by the German Council of Economic Experts.

“The Munich Security Conference, then Trump-Zelensky Renovation, called an awakening. For the first time, Europeans will not be able to trust Washington. After that, many people had sleepless nights.”

“Leading for European Defense Spend Adventures on Development Development Development Development In Development Development Development Bigs in the region, Dr. Fenella Mcgerty,” Chief of the protection economy at the International Strategic Studies in London.

In Germany, defense costs increased by 23.2% last year, the European defense external operation increased by 11.7%.

“The significant initiatives announced in Germany are key to open the next increase,” said Dr. McGergty.

“Over, any progress has been made to strengthen the German military capacity.”

Friedrich Merz, a new new Chancellor, which includes Germany, is in a race against time.

The new parliament gathered on March 25 and everyone is not in favor of all of these money, especially the protection.

Both right AFD party and remote Linke promised to oppose it. The voting road needs two-thirds to cross the road, so Merz has a better chance of today’s current (old) parliament today. Then it must be approved by the upper house of Germany.

Meanwhile, Europe still comes with the shock of ads from Trump management.

Last month, I watched as a delegation, the US Vice President JD Vice President JD Vice was listened to the attack on European policy on migration and free speech.

This should not be previously not before US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth before the 80-year-old defensive umbrella of America’s European Members.

Protection strategists in Europe are already planning to make inconspications: In Ukraine, then restore his army and restore his army, and Eastern members of NATO, such as the Baltic Countries, for three years or less.

This seems to be extremely martyrs in terms of US loyalty to Europe’s defense. President Trump, in some circle, is called us to remove us from Europe and even remove NATO.

France talks about the national nucleus to cover other European peoples.

Meanwhile, most European governments are under pressure to raise defense costs after years of cut.

The British Army has now been the smallest size since the Napoleonal wars, for more than 200 years, experts predict the expiration of ammunition for two weeks in Europe.

Germany has been cautious about protection costs for historical reasons for both the 2009 global debt crisis in 1945.

This returns to the important vote in the Bundestag. It’s not just about defense. Part of 500 billion euros (420 billion pounds) for the German infrastructure (£ 420 billion) (£ 420 billion) (420 billion pounds) insists on the green party to pay for climate change measures.

The other part is released from unlimited billions of euros for defense expenses for the expenses of the Constitution, the theoretical and the Armed Forces of Germany and the European Defense Fund. On March 4, President Ursula Von Der Leien announced a defensive fund of 800 billion euros named Rearom European Foundation.

The proposal that voted in Berlin is no longer expenses to protect against more than 1% of Germany’s GDP (s). So far, this debt ceiling has been identified in GDP in 0.35 PCT.

Other countries will be closely monitored to see this proposal passes. If so, the ‘Rearm Europe’ project of the EU Commission may be out of a beginning.

Today is something in trouble for the security of Europe. If it is no longer available to the US background or at least it is not trusted to come to Europe’s defense, what should the continent should fill in the space?

Let’s start from the numbers. According to Kiel’s Institute, these things spent only 0.1% of their wealth to help protect Ukraine, which spent 0.15% of Europe.

“This means that” Giuseppe Iroxi of the Kiel Institute “said,” If the European deficiency corrected, it is necessary to double the contribution of up to 0.21%. “

But today, this is not just about money, regardless of what is happening in Berlin.

Most of the most wanted weapons in Ukraine’s armor, the United States came from the United States as long-range artillery systems such as Patriot Air Defense and Hinars. The Kiel Institute is 86% of Ukrainian missile artillery and 86% of the United States, 82% and 82% are the source of the United States.

Then, there are all the questions about the US intelligence assistance for Kiev, most of which are taken from satellites and location images. If I had to turn off Washington permanently, the forces of Ukraine are partially blind.

If the American nuclear arsenal is removed from the equation of the nuclear arsenal, there is a massive difference between the combined total of 5,000 plus headings and the United Kingdom and French nukes. However, it still leaves enough leaves to act as a nuclear disabled.

“Ordinary”, that is, when it comes to. Nuclear branches are deprived of Western defenders, NATO’s combined forces are superior to Russia.

Perhaps, but if there is a standing lesson to get out of the Ukrainian war, it is “mass” issues. Russia’s army may be poor, but the President Putin, Ukraine’s fronts and missiles, the Russians are slowly and huge on the frontline.

This should not come as a surprise. Moscow laid his economy in the leg of war some time ago. As the Minister of Defense, an economist appointed and many armed ammunition tried many of the factories to prevent drones, especially explosive.

Many European peoples have lifted their feet in order to increase the number of 2% of NATO, 2% of GDP, about 7% of Russia. About 40% of Russia’s national budget is spent on defense.

Thus, if it is close to praising Europe’s protection and safety, there is a fairness to do it.

“If it votes, it will be important for Germany and Europe,” he said.

“It will determine a precedent and allow others to follow … But the occupation of Ukraine has three years, the need for more money, but reminds you that there is enough money.

“Europe needs protection and security leaders who can walk to the deteriorating Euro-Atlantic security environment. It would be most valuable for Europe, not a financial reform.”