FC Bundestag in crisis over AfD players

The German parliament’s football team was Adamant that it already had enough rights. But the Bundestag’s Court of Berlin was derived by the Berlin Court, which overthrow members of the team members of a distant alternative to Germany.

The microctremm of a pregnant debate on how to deal with AFD, which demanded the second historic election last month. The club must decide how much he answers his weekly meeting.

“More than 20 percent of the population voted for us and wants us to be represented in various offices in parliament, and Bundestag’s Bundestag member Malt Kuffman. “This is an example of how the rights of the opposition are violated in Germany.”

The team starts in 1967.

They play a weekly meeting with business, culture and civil society against other amateur jobs, as well as an annual competition against other groups of other countries in Europe.

Over the years, players have covered the former Chancellor Gerhard Shboler, former Minister of Finance Wolfgang Shbol and Joschka Fischer, the country’s first green foreign minister. Two weeks before the German reunion, the team played against the members of the “People’s Chamber” of the German Palace of the Communist Party.

The team has long been included as the opportunity to build long-distance collaboration on the field.

“If you fought and sweated together and showered after that, you will also gather together together [parliamentary] Committee, “said Tim Klaus Rigert, Frankfurter Algemen Zeytung on his 40th anniversary.

But about 100 members of the club have drawn drawings to the AFD, the anti-immigration, the anti-legal party, the large parts of which have been officially threatened by the country’s internal intelligence service for the democratic order of Germany.

152-strong group of party in the next parliament includes numbers Who described themselves as a “friendly face” of Nazism and played the crimes of Adolf Hitler’s SS?

It is a red line for the Green Legislator of the Green Legislator, which has said financial times.

The team decided last year to completely ban AFF members, as after all of the previous legislators and followed by careful check.

Member of the Public Democrats Mahmoud Ozdemir said that the ban was held last year’s discovery that AFF senior officials have held a secret meeting, including German citizens.

He described the history and mass protests, which followed the nature of the “Awakening Call” party, which he said that he presented “deep right-right extremist values.”

He said that the decision to form a party to form a party was met “Great Assistance through the team and with those who want to play with us.”

But AFD responded to fury and challenged the ban on court.

Last week, the Berlin Court of Berlin told the Berlin court that was “unnecessary” to make “significant reasons” or not. It is said that the step has violated the club’s own charters, which say that membership should be open to any current or former members of the German parliament.

FC Bundestag is now facing a dilemma. Let AFD members return or change his charters.

But such a step demanded two-thirds of the members, when the new Bundestag is added for the first time next week. The parliament will take Christian Democrats, who first came to the last month’s election.

At the time of last year’s ban, the CDU player Fritz Guntzler feared that excluding AFD only “strengthens their status” by strengthening their anti-female arguments. From a rest, tough dead protein, said that it allowed AFD to “Play Martyr.”

Toucher Saxton, the German state of East Germany, has released the idea, saying that the party will play, no matter what. “AFD is a victim of coronavirus, climate discussions, wind turbines, football club,” he said.

Regardless of how the AFD depict it, the party must be ruled out, he argued. “AFD can be chosen democratic, but for me AFD is not a democratic party.”

The line goes to the heart of the debate on how to deal with a party that many critics are convinced, want to dismantle the democracy of the nation.

All the main parties still say that they are committed to maintaining a “firewall” party, refusing to cooperate with it or allow you to join the coalition government at the Federal or Local level.

The cross-party group of deputies pushed the last legislative period, even farther, calling on AFF to ban the Constitutional Court. Some of these legislators have promised to restore those efforts in the coming years.

But many high-ranking German politicians are very critical for the idea. Chancellor-waiting Friedrich Merz warned that he would “kill the mill” AFD.

The founded parties also apply to battles that are played by AFD that one of its members should be assumed by the German parliament’s vice president’s role.

“Sport is always politically,” said Munk Makin Gross, even if the lines were insignificant on the team, and the AFD depicted it as “just football.”

The central parties were afraid that allowing AFD playing field would mean the beginning of a slippery slope, it is gross. “It simply came to our notice then.