Elon Musk wants to use AI to run the US government, but experts say ‘very bad’ ideas | Elon Musk News

Does Elon Musk plan to use artificial intelligence to manage the US government? This seems to be his plan, but experts say this is “a very bad idea.”

Musk fired ten thousands of federal government officials through the government’s efficiency (DOGE) department, and he demands that the rest of the employees send an email to provide five bullets to explain that they work this week.

This, of course, thousands of these types of these types of these types of this type of email, rely on artificial intelligence to process musk and help determine who should be used. Part of that plan is to replace many government officials with AI systems.

Democrats in the US Congress, however, the US Congress, however, they can have any of the use of these AI systems, but without verification and verification of these tools, they warned that those who warn the use of the EU can be disastrous.

“To use the AI ​​tools responsibly, it must be intended for a specific purpose. It should be tested and approved. It is not clear here,” Cary Coglianese, law and political sciences at Pennsylvania University.

Coglianese says that if the AI ​​is used to decide who should be terminated from the work, it will be “very doubtful.” He says that there is a very real potential for the mistakes to be made for biased and other potential problems of the EU.

“It’s a very bad idea. Such decisions of the EU (how such decisions are based on how such decisions are built or how algorithms are set or confident, Michigan University is a public policy professor at Michigan University.

These concerns, especially the musk and a billionaire businessman and US President Donald Trump do not seem to do these efforts with a close billionaire businessman and a close consultant.

For example, the US State Department, for example, plans to use the EU’s social media accounts of foreign citizens to recognize anyone who could be an hour of an hour to cancel the visas. The US government has not been transparent so far as such systems can work.

Unclaimed losses

“Trump management is really interested in implementing AI during all expenses, and I would like to see the AI ​​fair, just and fair use,” Hilke Schellmann, a specialist of journalism and artificial intelligence at New York University. “There may be a lot of damage to undefined.”

AI experts say that the use of the EU has many ways can make a mistake, so it should be taken carefully and honestly. Governors, including Coglianese, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, may be mistaken or prejudice, and eventually rejected the welfare benefits of the residents who need a problem with an unusual EU.

In the United States, in the province of Michigan, the alleged fraud was wrong with the AI, which was used to find fraud in the unemployment system. Most of those who reject the benefits were harshly, including many penalties, and were charged with fraud. People were arrested and even applied for bankruptcy. After a five-year period, the state system was incorrect, and a year later, residents admitted to the residents that were accused of mistaken $ 21 million.

“Often these technologies, the officers who have purchased and placing these technologies, know how their work, biases and limits and mistakes,” said Parasaraty. “Because the marginalized communities, vice versa, tend to have the most contact with social services (eg unemployment benefits, protection, protection), the most affected by the problem AI.”

When the AI ​​tries to predict the problems or when the crime is trying to predict the crimes to determine the crimes to determine what one’s convictions in the courts.

Schellmann says that the AI, which is used by police officers, is usually developed from these departments, and the EU has long been very excessive, especially until colored communities, especially until colored communities.

AI doesn’t understand anything

One of the potential problems using the AI ​​in the federal government to replace the AI ​​is a large number of jobs in the government that requires specific skills and knowledge. Although a dog man in the chair of Justice, although the same job is also the same job, there may be a very different job in the agricultural department. Therefore, the AI ​​program should have raised a high level of complex and medium medical work to replace a human worker.

“I don’t think that random people cut the work (you can replace them with any AI),” Coglianese says. “The responsibilities of these people are often highly qualified and specific.”

Schellmann says you can use AI to see the work of a pre-or repetitive, but you can’t completely replace someone. If you want to spend years to develop the correct AI means to make many, many different jobs – not as it seems to be a very difficult task and government.

“There is a nuanced understanding of these workers and the issues that EU do not have the EU. Thus, have a limited program and even strengthens historical biases. “

The leadership of former US President Joe Biden given In 2023, an executive order was aimed at testing and approval of the AI’s responsibility and the EU’s testing and approval, but this order was abolished by the Trump Office in January. Schellmann says that this is responsible for the AI ​​government, or said that researchers could understand how the AI ​​was used.

All this was said, if AI develops responsibly, it can be very useful. AI can automate repetitive tasks so that employees can focus on more important things or help employees can help solve the problems they fight. But this should be given the time to be placed properly.

“This is not to say that we cannot use AI’s tools wisely,” said Coglianese. “However, governments mislead when they tried to rush and inspect the right public entry and comprehensive confirmation and how the algorithm is.”