Drake “lost rap -bit” – states UMG in motion to reject the claim

Legal Battle between Drive And the Universal Music Group (UMG) has taken another turn, and the label seeks to deny the rapper’s lawsuit.

The dispute focuses on the role of UMG in the promotion of the dish -track Kendrick Lamar “doesn’t like us”, which the Drake claims to have led to harmful consequences.

However, the UMG pushes back, claiming that Drake’s claims are groundless. The petition, previously filed on Monday, challenged the legitimacy of Drake’s case, saying it was just an attempt to recover after the defeat of society rather than a true legal resentment.

In it supplyThe Universal Music Group did not hold back in the criticism of the legal step.

The label claimed that Drake “lost the rap -bit he provoked, and in which he readily participated,” claiming that instead of taking the results, he addressed legal measures to “snatch his wounds”.

In addition, the UMG accused Drake of his own position on artistic freedom, noting that he had previously signed a petition condemning the use of REP -texts in court.

“Drake was right and now mistaken,” the petition said, strengthening their claim that there is not enough merit in the lawsuit.

In his lawsuit, Drake claimed that the UMG participation in promoting “not like us” was slander and persecution.

However, the UMG claimed that there is no legal basis for these claims, stating that the song expresses “an inactive opinion and rhetorical hyperbole, not a fact.”

The company also emphasized the perceived double standard, noting that although Drake is waiting for the support of its own disk tracks, it objects to the similar lamor reaction.

Leibl insisted that their actions were within legal and ethical limits, and that Draik’s requirements did not meet the necessary criteria for work in court.

Despite UMG’s attempt to reject the case, Dreyko’s legal team remains firm in his position.

Prosecutor rapper, Michael J. Gotlib claimed that the lawsuit is not just rap -we.

said Gotlib Variety“UMG wants to pretend to be about rap -bit to divert their shareholders, artists and the public from the simple truth: a greedy campaign, finally, is responsible for the profit from dangerous misinformation, which has already led to many acts of violence.”

He also suggested that the UMG has the history of artists and that the case would open deeper system problems in the music industry.

Gotlib said: “This movement is a desperate load of UMG to avoid accountability, but we have confidence that this case will continue and continue to reveal a long history of occurrence, abuse, abuse and use of its artists.”

The lawsuit submitted in the New York Federal Court came after it withdrew the legal task, accusing UMG and Spotify of artificially inflated song. UMG rejected claims as “illogical”.

The lawsuit states that the UMG preferred the “corporate greed over the safety and well -being of its artists”, distributing “not like us”, which called the Drake “certified pedophile”.

He claimed that the UMG intentionally promoted the track to distribute “false actual accusations” and incur damage.

The lawsuit also emphasized the work of a song that shows the image of the Draika House, which was similar to the houses of registered sexual violators.

Draik’s legal team claimed that the UMG deliberately published and made a profit from false claims, holding the label responsible for the impact of the song.

“This lawsuit is not about the artist who created” not the way we are, “the submission reads.

However, the UMG strongly denied the allegations, insisting that they greatly contributed to Drake’s success.

“These claims are not only not true, but also the concept that we seek to harm the reputation of any artist – not to mention Drake – illogical,” the press -secretary said Trustee.

They also accused “one dance” of “” weapons of the legal process to silence the artist’s creative expression “, despite the fact that he used the same industry practice throughout his career.