DOJ to Trump sends frightening letters to medical magazines for being “guerrilla”
The US Department of Justice has sent letters to medical magazines for being “guerrilla”, strongly suggesting that they are distributing misinformation and influenced by “funding” rather than medical science. Gizmodo confirmed that The Journal Redy, a reviewed publication on pulmonary care published by the American College of Medical Doctors, received a letter this week. And Medpage today He reports that at least two other magazines have received such frightening letters.
One of the DOJ letters signed by the US intermediate lawyer for Colombia County, Edward R. Martin, Jr. went viral On Social Media Thursday and is addressed to the editor-in-chief of the crate of the magazine, Dr. Peter Matsone.
“He brought me attention that more and more magazines and publications such as the Redy Journal admit that they are guerrillas in various scientific debates,” explains the letter from Martin, “That is, they have a position for which they are interconnected or because of advertising (under zip code) or sponsorship (in the relevant fraud regulations).
The letter then continues to list several questions, none of which is the scope of the US Department of Justice, given the protection of freedom of speech provided by the first amendment to the US Constitution:
- How do you evaluate your public protection responsibilities from misinformation?
- How are you clearly articulated for the public when you have certain perspectives that are influenced by your current relationships with supporters, financing, advertisers and more?
- Do you accept articles or essays from competitive perspectives?
- How do you evaluate the role of civil servants and funding organizations such as National Health Institutes in the development of presented articles?
- How do you deal with the claim that the authors of works in your magazines may have misled their readers?
The letter says: “I am also interested in knowing if the publishers, magazines and organizations you work with are adjusting their method of accepting competitive perspectives. Are there any new norms to be developed and offered?” while ending with a request for a response by May 2.
He reached an email comment, a breast spokesman confirmed the authenticity of the letter, while noting, “His content was published online without our knowledge.” The magazine also publishes a public statement Online Friday confirms its editorial standards, but did not specifically address DOJ’s letter.
“In their 90-year history, breasts publish numerous articles that are broadcast in research and clinical treatment, improving the medical profession and improving the health and well-being of patients around the world,” a message published on Friday said in a message.
The magazine continued to emphasize the editorial standards to which publication adheres, including IC and Management guidelinesS
“Breast bats to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) and COPE’s ethical directions for scientific publication, applying strict partnership standards to ensure scientific rigor,” the statement continues. “As a publisher, the American College of Medical Doctors respects and supports the editorial independence of the magazine.”
The spokesman told Gizmodo by email that the legal advisor is currently reviewing the DOJ’s request and the magazine is currently no more comments. It is not yet clear which other magazines cited by Medpage today They may have received the letters. The US Prosecutor’s Office for Colombia did not immediately answer questions by email on Friday.
President Donald Trump has launched a war for retribution against the enemies adopted, recently ordered the Ministry of Justice to investigate Chris Krebs, a cybersecurity expert whom Trump does not like, as he denied the fake claims of the president that the 2020 elections were falsified or stolen. Trump has also blackmailed several law firms for over a billion dollars in professional work, some of whom really regret their decisions to play a ball, according to a recent report on New York TimesS Trump also threatened to withdraw funding from major universities if he did not lean to his will, like many like the capitulation of the University of Colombia. Harvard University backed back and, according to reports, Trump told IRS to undress the institution status-liberated from taxesS
The Law Society, a conservative legal group, requested to the DC Disciplinary Court Appeal Law Office to investigate an investigation into investigation A few of Martin’s actions As he was appointed by President Trump as an American lawyer. Martin has announced investigations against his political opponents, tried to intimidate a law firm, which is a special lawyer Jack Smith and demonstrates “a major misunderstanding of the role of a federal prosecutor,” according to the group.
ACLU of DC too sent a letter Back in February, outlining his concerns about how Martin threatened people because of a protected speech, in particular when the lawyer promised legal action against anyone who takes action to hinder the so-called Elon Musk Efficiency Ministry. Musk illegally destroys the Federal Government, unilaterally dismisses entire agencies such as USAID, and reduces funding for vital services, although it has no authority to do so. But Martin seemed to threaten anyone who hinders their activities, even as he just spoke against them.
Trump is obviously trying to create the United States as a fascist country, as it violates vital government services, threatens US allies with an invasion and delivers people convicted of a crime in a prison for torture in El Salvador without a proper process. Trump apparently neglected the Supreme Court’s order to return a man more special than the Sekot Prison, Kilmar Abrego GarciaBut the regime refuses to comply.
And if the story has taught us something, it is that the ideology of fascism is comprehensive. Yes, they are coming to medical magazines now, as ridiculous as it sounds. And every supporter of Trump, who thinks he will escape from the anger of fascism, is very wrong. In this type of system, everyone is eventually made to prove their devotion to the leader. Anyone who makes a mistake or steps out of order, as much as they think they have proven themselves, will still feel the consequences.