Directed by Exorcist William Friedkin didn’t care about this movie Stephen King

The late William Friedkin He had a reputation for his wild, whirlwind, an aggressive personality on films. It was so confused and temperamental that the nickname “hurricane was beaten” from its employees. History of 1973 “exorcist” stories are told often, and many actors, photographers and writers talked about the things that came from the camera during the shooting of this film. It seems like a friendly appearance seems to have flourished in a chaotic setting and played loud sound cassettes of tribal singing between them. Someone even claimed that Friedkin occasionally firing into the air, making sure everyone was a little coming up. This behavior is considered too reckless today, but in the gray days of the 1970s it was considered some metal.

Friedkin made several horror films and thrillers in his career outside the “exorcist”, which is still often considered one of the worst films of all time and peoples. He also directed the film “Rampage” in 1987, and “My-Nanny-IS-A-Murder-Druid Flick” in 1990. In 2006 and 2011 and “Joe’s killer” perhaps two the most disturbing movies in his career.

In an interview with 2015 with ViceThe director claimed that he had no particular tendency to horror, just attracted to certain types of stories. Friedkin made movies, a sports film, a soft drama of the courtroom and numerous crimes. There is no genre to which he felt affection. However, he acknowledged that he was definitely more attracted to dark dramas than light comedies; His only real comedy film was his 1967 debut “Good Time” with Sonny & Cer.

The vice -interview of Frykin was asked in horror, in particular, and, discussing the genre, he admitted that I hate a prominent house with ghosts: “radiance” by Stanley Kubrick.

Friedkin thought there were only three reasons when people go to the movies: laughing, crying and afraid. Friedkin, in fact, was not agile in making movies that caused laughter, but sometimes he could make us cry and, most often, make us scare. Even Fridkin’s Negurka movies are intense enough to maintain an accidental audience at the border, and when it comes to his simple horror movies, he had a certain way to think about it. It seems his approach was independent of the excess of style … what he hated about “radiance”. He said:

“I find shining. I’m not a fan ‘The voice ‘ In general. I felt it masturbating things. I don’t think it is terrible and I also found it … a little incomprehensible. I don’t know what it would be ***! “

Stanley Kubrik can be easily blamed for coolness and upbringing. Many of his characters do not feel completely human, and the slow, intentional step of the director can be released for some viewers. Friedkin was definitely not fascinated by Kubrick style. He seemed to like a better, brightest story – stories that were deepened into madness and panic in such a way that Kubrik would remain at a distance.

And Friedkin, making the “exorcist” certainly have All right to Lambast “shining” as Stephen King does. Of course, two movies are very different, but both are regularly on the list of the best 10, and both of them are recognized as one of the worst of all time and peoples. In defense of Friedkin, I believe that it will take a lot to scare the guy who made the “exorcist”.