Democratic senators call for reform of the Privacy Act in response to Takeover

The arbitrary ways in which the government implies the release of “routine use” has been criticized since at least 1977 when a a Fishery committee Congress created by Congress reports that federal law enforcement agencies create “wide-ranging routine applications”, while other agencies have been engaged in Quid Pro Quo agreements-develop their own novel Routine Applications as long as other agencies join the same.

Nearly a decade later, its own group of Congress evaluators will find that “routine use” has become “Catch“To the law.

In an effort to overcome the excessive use of this release, the bill introduced by democratic senators includes a new arrangement, which, combined with improved minimization requirements, will require any “routine” routine of private data to be “reasonably needed”. In the meantime, agencies will be required to make publicly known “any goals” for which a record of the Privacy Act can actually be used.

Codi Wentzke, a senior councilor for the US Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), notes that the bill will also convey to Americans the right to judge countries and municipalities, while expanding the right to act that may cause violations that can reasonably cause harm. “Watching the courts and how they dealt with all the variety of costumes filed under the Privacy Act, it was disappointing to see them that it was not necessary to seriously take the damage to the data or acknowledge the potential possible harm that could occur,” he says. Another major change, he adds, is that the bill is expanding, which is actually covered by the Law on Privacy by simply citizens and legal residents to virtually every physical in the United States -equalizing the law more healthier with the current federal statutes, limiting the scope of the most powerful government monitoring instruments.

In another key provision, the bill further strives to take advantage of the use of the government by the so-called “Computer match“A process where a person’s private records are forwarded to two agencies, helping the government make new conclusions that every record could not consider.

Changes imposed on the new Democrats bill will simply extend these protection to various record systems held by one agency. In the event that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has one system that contains “incorrect tax reimbursement” records, while another contains data on “seizure and sale of real estate”. These changes will ensure that match restrictions are still being applied, although both systems are controlled by IRS. Moreover, while the restrictions on the coincidence do not currently extend to “statistical projects”, they would be under the new text if the purpose of the project could influence the “rights, benefits or privileges of people”. Or – in the case of federal employees – refer to “financial, staff or disciplinary action”.

Currently, the Law of Privacy imposes a lot of scarce criminal fines (not more than $ 5,000) against civil servants who deliberately reveal the private records of Americans to anyone who does not respond to them. The Democrats bill introduces a fine of up to $ 250,000, as well as the possibility of imprisonment, for anyone who has leaked records “for commercial advantage, personal profit or malicious harm”.

The bill has been approved by Electronic Privacy Information Center (Epic) and Public citizenTwo non -profit civil liberties organizations, which are both engaged in active litigation against Dodge.

“More than 50 years ago, Congress adopted the Privacy Act to protect the public from exploitation and abuse of their personal information posted by the government,” Marko said in a statement. “Today, when Elon Musk and the Doga team are recklessly striving to have access to the sensitive data of the Americans, it is time to bring this law to the Digital Age.”