Creator James Bond has written the script for the fierce film franchise

The Live and Die Die has a moment that sets the tone for the whole run by Roger Mo as James Bond. Left dead on the island in the middle A pond full of hungry crocodilesMasonry 007 makes shoots using three deadly reptiles as a safety step, barely shying the legs in this process. There is still a lot from where it happened, including the jump of the car on the barrel “man with a gold pistol”, a blafd that throws smoke in “Only for your eyes”, and the snowboard scene put on the beach at the Murder Representative. But perhaps a movie about finding a masonry is not as stupid as “Moonraker”.

Advertisement

After the success of the “spy that loved me”, the next adventure of the masonry had to be “only for your eyes”. (There is even “James Bond will return …” Tisser in the final loans of the former movie.) But “” Star Wars: Episode IV – New Hope “got into the theater, and suddenly every major studio entered to earn the success of the wild popular space opera George Lucas. The Eon must also monitor this in order to keep up with the competition and refer to the most novel bonds of Jan Fleming “Moonraker” for inspiration.

This time, Bond was going to disrupt the evil impacts of one Hugo Drax (Michael Lonsdale), an industrialist who seeks to destroy everyone on the ground from his space station and create a master Gone. Because it was not inappropriate enough, the jaws (Richard Kiel) also returned from the previous film and received a girlfriend, and there were many points in the Venetian Gondol Chase as a double pigeon. However, the audience eaten it, and “Moonraker” became the highest content of the bonds to “Goldhenye” ​​in 1995.

Advertisement

Despite their success, “Moonraker” is seen as One of the worst films about bonds (and almost certainly the most stupid). However, it might be much different if Fleming had reached. Prior to his death in 1964, the author wrote a film based on his original novel. He was considered lost almost 50 years before he appeared again in 2015 and was auctioned by a private participant. The details are small, but it is safe to say that it was closer to the novel “Moonraker” than in the film adaptation of 1979. That’s what we know.

“Moonraker” was the third novel by James Bond John Fleming, and despite the title, it is very related to the earth. In Britain, James Bond, intended entirely in Britain, is intended for the investigation of Sir Hugo Draks, the respected industry and the former Hero of the British War. Draks uses Nazi missile technology V2 to develop a Moonraker program designed to protect the country from incoming attacks. In the end, Bond reveals that Draks is actually a former scientist who works under cover for the Soviet Union and plans to arm his nuclear combat missile to destroy London.

Advertisement

Published in 1955, “Moonraker” entered the painful memories of V1 missile attacks on the English capital during World War II and increased fears of nuclear destruction when the cold war. These problems were very real for the public, since the atomic devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 10 years earlier was still fresh in the minds of many people. The novel was accepted as a strangely gloomy meditation on the decline of the British Empire, as well as the fact that the nation lost when the catastrophic conflict began so quickly after the last. The development of Bond Fleming’s character was recognized as Draks was praised for becoming one of Bond’s most plausible villains (one of the equivalent in the real world that posed a true threat). Some fans were not so excited and were disappointed with the lack of exotic places that provided escape for British readers who rarely saw directions outside their real -life shores.

Advertisement

Although some view “Moonraker” as a masterpiece of Fleming, Cubby Brocoli was not so excited. Even after the Eon Productions was late used it to earn on the phenomenon of “Star Wars”, it rejected the book story as “a small rocket that rose to the destruction of London”. It is clear that the international blockbuster needs to be greater. Christopher Wood’s script only accepted the title and basic elements of Fleming’s history before expanding it to space stations and global genocide in the hands of Draksa, which became more standard villain bonds with world domination projects.

Jan Fleming wrote from experience when he created James Bond, relying on his first -hand British intelligence during World War II. He thought that work with the “dirty trade” spies, and his most famous hero was a correspondingly delicate, cold killer whose tendency to more subtle things served as a balm in the profession where he could meet the ugly end at any moment. In short, 007 Fleming is unlikely to be more different from the masonry masonry heart.

Advertisement

Fleming conceived “Moonraker” as a novel that would eventually find his journey in the cinema and wrote his treatment on 150 pages a year after the book was published. With the “Doctor” the first adaptation to the big screen for another six years, the details show that it was a much more restrained business than even relatively justified by Chaon Canery’s adventures. It was Fleming’s only attempt on the script, and John Gilbert, Flaming’s expert, noted that it was quite difficult in prose and “much more serious” than the 1979 movie.

The main differences from the franchise we know and love include the absence of M and Miss Monipen. Bond commander is presented as a brilliant civil servant, probably more like a secret service boss that Fleming knew at one time with a military intelligence. The jaws are also never visible: Memorable steel oven Richard Kiel appeared as an equivalent villain called the “Horvitz Horvitz” in the later novel Fleming “Spy, which fell in love.” Another inclusion in Fleming’s script has become a brand new character called Tosh, a special agent that works under cover as a Cockney Sharp card.

Advertisement

One of the details evaluated by the Bond fan is the choice of swimwear 007. Like Sean Conen and Daniel Craig, Fleming’s bond wears a light shorts, sinking from the Kenta coast. With the opening of Fleming’s script and constant rumors about the direction of the bond franchise can accept in the future, it raises an intriguing question: can we once get a “Moonraker” reboot closer to how its author initially imagined it?