Classic Universal Shooting of a Horror movie that was banned in the UK

Did you see the animated short animated “Walt Disney” “The Skeleton Dance?” Part of the “Silly Symphony” series DisneyShort rotates around four human skeletons that have fun in the cemetery, mimicing an allegorical dance dance (also known as Dunz Makasr). This is not particularly awful, but it is a fun, intricate animation that is still considered a sense of nostalgic affection. However, this short 1930 was not always considered through such a benign lens. Indeed, the Skeleton Dance was banned in Denmark after its original release, and its topic was also considered … Macabre. This moral position to substantiate censorship may seem a little stupid, as animated skeletons using bones as a xylophone, are unlikely to create a restless room. Well, in vaguely related news, the short one entered the public domain of the United States on January 1, 2025, so you can now enjoy these beautiful skeletal gentlemen that have a solemn time for the content of your heart.

Censorship in cinema or related visual media can come in many forms; Some include the so -called moral justifications, while others are subtangled with subtly vested political programs. Regional laws also play an integral role in the implementation of prohibitions, such as the Law on the Boy Kingdom Houses (1751), which was often used to classify public cinema examinations as potentially moral activities. The British Film Council (BBFC) was created in 1912 to restrain such unjustified claims, but it also meant to follow the Council’s certification rules that were more arbitrary than today’s age ratings. However, adherence to the certification rules may be of little weight if the social indignation of the branded film as one well -deserved censorship, as it was in the case of “devils” by Ken Russell, when it was banned in several countries with the X.

But if you think about the silent classic of the horrors of 1925, “the phantom of the opera”, there is virtually no similarity between the alarming stunning images found in Some of the more sad horror movies that will be banned in several countries (Think “Holocaust”) and this moving saga convicted romance and violence. More than that the legendary lone of the CHIRYPlays the title -pantom that pursues the object of its desire throughout the film, provides the performance so deep that it exceeds the restrictions of the silent environment. The complex, by highlighting the pain from the social rogue, which refuses to cruelty when he is denied, love brings layered themes from the source of Gaston’s novel to the bright life. Why then was the banned movie in the UK?

When the Universal Pictures Greenlit Production on the “Phantom of the Opera” in 1924 parallels between this adaptation and the 1923 studio “Notre -to” was inevitable. The predominant success of “Tea” (also a silent film) relied on the reflection of Carni’s humpback bell, which made it a natural contender for the role of Eric, the so -called phantom that causes the film’s events. In Leroux novel, a young singer named Christine Dae is suddenly noticed by a distinctive voice, which suevely pushes her to replace the prima Carlot for his further career. Her lover Raul de Chaugny does not drive her away from what dictates a voice, and it is too late when the horrifying phantus reveals itself and requires Christina’s love. Things end with violence and tragedy, making the work of Lera inversion of “beauty and beast”, which is designed through the Opera Horror lens.

The scene in which the phantom reveals itself to reveal its true visit was emphasized as the cause of the film ban in the UK. However, the reasons seem to be more difficult than the moral concern of the scene, which was considered too horrible for the audience. A 1926 Report The New York Times He claims that the UK secretary at the time considered the movie “Smart and Drawing Mystification” and believed it was a propaganda that should be used to “set goals”. However, the report does not specify these statements and do not determine exactly what scenes made the official make these assumptions. In addition to these reasoning, however, it is widely believed that the phantom scene – which allegedly caused panic among some audiences – was the main reason for the ban.

It should also be noted that there are several cuts for the film. The first incision was changed from the bad reaction of the audience during the premiere in Los -Angeles as they believed that the film should not end with a redemption kiss (which is essentially humanized). The updated aspects of the second reduction had to be made quickly and not apply too much costs, which required the movement of changes to scripts and reshuffle. However, this version, which was more comedy in tone, was worse than the original, resulting in the final version that ended with the fact that the phantom was abandoned to death. Unfortunately, the initial redemption incision is now considered lost.