Can US forces in Europe refuse to supply and support? | News of Russia-Ukrainian War

At the beginning of March, the Norwegian Naval Supplier Haltbakk Bunkers refused to serve the US military ship by calling others to boycott US fleet.

Haltbakk CEO Gunar turned out to attend Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky humiliation The White House was allegedly ungrateful for US President Donald Trump to protect his country from one Russian occupation for US military support.

“Although Ukraine restricts itself and puts itself in the backstage of the United States, a large loan to keep calm. He made us sick. … There is no fuel to Americans!” The company wrote in the Facebook post.

Then, the company deleted the company and the Norwegian government will soon insisted that the US warships ‘supply and support’.

However, the incident stressed the dependence of US forces in Europe with local suppliers and the good intentions of the government.

The US forces have dates in the history of European refusal to help US operations very complicate US operations.

Headed by 1973 Arab-Israeli WarBoth Greece and Cyprus refused to help the US ships and planes fill the fuel in Israel, to force them to trust the British assistance.

In 2003, Turkey’s occupation in 2003, Turkey, Turkey, Turkey, Turkey refused to use the aircraft base of the aircraft in the Incirlik, or to pass the Turkish airspace.

For such reasons, the US forces set up discounts on the supply chain.

The sixth navigation of the United States, Chania, Cremin, the Mayor in 2005, “We do not want a warship.

Demetries Andrew Grimes, the United States has reacted to Greece and the reaction, then we reacted to the other mayors, the other mayors.

“We had a single small ship to use a portraul, water and fuel and garbage operations, tugboat operations and traffic jams, including 350 million euros ($ 379 million),” said 350 million euros ($ 379 million).

In interviews with Al Jazeera, European NATO employees took a picture of seamless cooperation.

“It is a military-military worker, as usual,” European military source told Al Jazeera. “We do not have any concern on the loyalty of US liabilities in Europe. We should just drop our head, good work and be a good ally.”

Keir Giles, Russia and Eurasia Expert, Chatham House, Haltbakk’ın Haltbakk’ın Bunker Service said, because we had a “counter-roductive” because in fact, we needed to keep the US forces in place, “he said.

Change assumptions?

So far, the hypothesis has seen the United States as vital for itself in Europe.

“In Europe, our Ports and Spain to Germany to Germany in Germany for Germany since 2018 since 2018 since 2018 since 2018 since 2018 since 2018 to 2018. 2018 since 2018 since 2018, 2018 has been in 2018 since 2018.” They protect Greeks or Turks or Germans since 2018. “

For example, any Russian sea traffic from St. Petersburg to the Atlantic Ocean, the Denmark of the Atlantic Ocean must pass the throat of Denmark, the largest point in the widest point of 20 km (12 miles).

NATO employees said that the operation of a sea rejection is an area that can lead to even Russian nuclear armed submarines.

Russia has an alternative route to the Atlantic, but Norway and the United Kingdom Navirs, Iceland and Norway are sometimes called “kill zone” for Russian fleet ships and submarines.

Again, the Trump Office insulted Denmark by claiming to be seized GreenlandAccording to the Danish area and Norway and other European allies, the United States said that the US President did not do to NATO, he said.

Latest, Trump threatened Canadian.

“These actions that threaten the Danish threatening Canada will be the results for us,” he said. He asked if he thought more events would be said, “This is possible.”

Some experts Al Jazeera’s Trump White House, left the ten-year doctrine of Europe’s security.

“The United States fleet (this forward positions) will be a strong interest. Will Trump leadership share this interest? This is the whole other question,” Giles said.

“What happened in Europe, what happened in Iraq and Libya – America’s progress leaves security vacuum,” said Greek Greek General Andreas Iliopoulos.

“If the United States is trying to reset through this reset, then these basics in Europe are losing all the strategic value. This is clear,” He said. “He said. Trump and Putin are currently acting like allies. “

Gravity for Trump in the concept of security with Russia “To move Russia away From China, “said Iliopoulos, but this can be saved.

The European Command (EUCOM) has about 84,000 personnel in Europe, more than a third of the total foreign staff. The United States pays full employees and equipment costs, but it gives us benefits through arms sales to Europe. Europe pays a third of the capital expenditures, but also obtains without justification.

Doubts about the loyalty of European security in the United States violated NATO’s confidence in mutual defense. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has once again confirmed this, but Trump has made a condition of the defense spending levels not determined.

Many Europeans thought that the United States will be ordered in an attack in Europe.

“If the anti-musk’s anti-musk actions continue to be a point where some resistance in the US system, Giles, Giles, referring to the federal government, referring to the federal government.

He asked the United States to leave the process of Europe that he was irreversible, said: “Unless there is no resistance or unexpected thing within the United States.”