Can Europe make a combined front of Ukraine’s future?

European leaders are climbing. The security summit collected in Paris on Monday is proof of this.

It is still repeated so that the United States is not invited to meet with Russia in connection with the future of Ukraine. US President Donald Trump said that Russian President Vladimir Putin could meet “very soon” on Sunday.

In Europe, under pressure, political differences and internal economic concerns, can you get aside, and together with the future of Ukraine, including the United Front?

They will try.

Trump management is not 100% exactly what you want to do about Ukraine. There were a number of mixed messages on the weekend.

This allows Europe to a small window, the American president is an incredible partner.

Donald Trump hopes to do this with the meeting between Paris, which was rolled by the two main issues: Europe sent more and more for its defense and sent troops to Ukraine after the ceasefire.

European leaders insist on the participation of Kiev in the ceasefire. For a long time, “without Ukraine, there will be no decisions on Ukraine,” they continued.

But this is more to Europe.

This is a cold realization – a very scary but not completely unexpected – the Trump management does not prioritize relations with both European partners or their protection.

Europe has relied on a security umbrella provided by the United States since World War II.

Depending on the Russian-US talks on Ukraine, there is a European fear to change how Putin feels and how he felt by him, and the continent to change the security architecture of the continent.

Putin has historically shows the spread of NATO to the east. Russian neighbors – small, former Soviet Baltic states and Poland are now being exposed.

All European countries will be on Monday. Military attacks: England, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and Denmark – Baltic and Nordic peoples, President of the EU Council and Defense Union, NATO Secretary General and Secretary General.

Other countries were reported to be followed by follow-up meetings.

Even in the collection of small Paris, it will be difficult to increase specific defense costs. Poland plans to organize 4.47% of GDP in 2025. Fight against the United Kingdom and not yet reached 2.5% of GDP.

However, leaders can better coordinate and spend more in NATO and shoulder for Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. The EU is expected to increase its defense efforts.

Most of the Paris meeting will also pay attention to sending troops to Ukraine after ceasefire.

The discussed idea is not for peacekeeping troops, but the ceasefire line, which stands behind “Raissibility”.

The purpose of the existence of a European troop would be three times. To send a message to Ukrainians: they are not alone. Another message to the United States is the only one to protect Europe to the protection of his continent and Kiev alone to warn that he would not deal with the ceasefire.

But it is a controversial concept and may not be popular with voters. For example, 50% of people wanted in Italy, they never want to send weapons to Ukraine, never send sons and brothers.

There are still many unanswered questions:

How long should each European country have to send to how long? What would their mission statement – for example, if Russia violated the agreed ceasefire conditions, can it be in a war with Russia directly to Russia? If there were the waists of the United States?

The United States would ask for security guarantees before Europe placement soldiers to Ukraine. One cannot take.

There is a lot to decide on Monday. And leaders, including the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, come to Paris with their internal concerns – can pay extra defense costs, do they have troops to send to Ukraine? Germany is frustrating to develop specific obligations before heated overall elections.

However, this summit is wider brushes than fine print. The conversation can at least start the public.

Will Donald Trump pay attention?

It’s hard to know.

After the Paris session, there is a conversation to send a messenger to Washington to do Europe’s work. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, for example, is close to the Trump management.

Sir Keir Starmer has a planned visit to Washington in a few days. It can be a chance to act as a bridge between Europe and the United States.

The Paris meeting also allows the United Kingdom and other European leaders to make further correction of relations after the bitterness of the brexit.

Mark Leonard can demonstrate the head of the Council of Europe in European foreign relations, Starmer’s can show that “Britain can show that it is a responsible life for European security.”

Issues such as trade relations and law enforcement cooperation hoping to improve the UK with the EU.

Host Nation France feels unique. The President for a long time, MACRON has long relying on many things in Europe when it comes to supply, technological capabilities and protection. A year ago, the headlines made the idea of ​​troops in Ukraine for the first time.

France, unlike the UK, says the Institute Montaigne Deputy Director for International Studies. This makes it less complicated to open it, now this Trump is in the White House, it requires Europe to take care of itself.

The United States has sent a document to the allies of the questions and questions, which are what governments and questions they want to place and promote to Ukraine for the peaceful majority of these countries. to apply the existing ones.

However, Julianne Smith recently held the US ambassador to NATO, such complex diplomatic work meet with normal weeks and uniforms.

It adds that if Europe’s leaders achieved in Paris, if they require a seat on Ukraine on Ukraine, their hands are weak.

“If Trump blends and not, Europe refuses to help completely? They can’t cut his nose to look at the face.”

In fact, if the United States plans to face more than Ukraine and more than Europe, they will have to significantly increase defense games.

If Donald Trump does not follow, Vladimir Putin is certainly.