“Brutalist” disputes against the backdrop of “Oscar”

As “Brutalist” is preparing for a big night in 2025 Academy Awards Of the 10 nominations, the success of the film was marred by the dispute.

Recently, director Brad Korbet showed that the II played a role in the process of producing the film, inciting discussions about artificial intelligence in film production. AI technology in the movie is not new. Movies like “here” in the lead roles Tom Hanks and Robin WrightAlso busy AI. However, the “Brutalist” became a point for discussion.

The reaction raises questions whether the creativity increases or undermines the artistry of human directors.

Blaine Brown, Vice -President of Innovation in Diversified, believes that AI transforms Galina, but emphasizes the importance of human examination.

“We start seeing Genai changes the way people are approaching Explosion. “What previously required a complete crew and wide and expensive resources can now be achieved with the help of tools integrated into everyday software. With Hollywood and leading technology companies that already use these innovations, we see transformation in production available for creators and enterprises.”

Despite these achievements, the II remains a polarizing theme in the film world. Many critics are worried that its increase in use can reduce authenticity and replace traditional skills. “The topic of the role of II in creative work is becoming more polarized,” he continued.

However, Brown notes that “technological shifts have always caused disputes”.

“For example,” Tron “in 1982 was deprived of the Academy Award for the special effects because the Academy considered the computer image” cheating “,” he said Explosion. “However, over time, CGI has become a standard practice. For many, the use of AI is concerned about the authenticity and whether the gate can repeat the human touch.”

Unlike “here”, where the II was used primarily for the actors, “Brutalists” used II for the voice cloning to clarify the Hungarian accents of his actors. The instrument allowed the performers to support their natural performances, providing linguistic accuracy.

“The same technology has huge potential to enhance foreign movies, making them more natural and affordable for a global audience,” Brown added.

Unlike this, “here” used the visual effects that are guided by AI, especially to reduce their leading. Instead of the traditional CGI, the production team prepared AI models using staff from different actors’ careers, which noted the transition to realism generated in cinema.

Critics claim that the II may jeopardize the human artistry of the cinema, replacing elements of organic creativity with machine efficiency. But Brown has been pushing this concern, explaining that AI has been silent for many years in film production.

“Today’s critics of II in film production often ignore how the industry works,” he said. “AI has been integrated into film production over the years, food tools such as the western movements, the currency modeling and the technology for aging. Tools such as AI, practical effects, and CGI are just tools of exciting narrative, not labels to creativity.”

Brown believes that most of the anxiety associated with the II is related to misunderstandings about its function, not a true threat to artistic integrity.

“Film production is never talking about the simple clicking of the buttons; it’s a deeply shared process,” he continues. “Art is essentially subjective and blooms through human contribution. AI does not replace creativity; it improves and supports it.”

The industry remains divided into the role of II in cinematic stories. Some see it as an exciting innovation and others fear that it violates traditional practices.

“I believe Explosion. “Although the loudest voices, as a rule, emphasize the risks, my personal conviction is that most experts perceive it as a powerful tool for innovation, but it should be handled responsibly.”

Going forward, Brown predicts that AI will continue to rearrange the production of films, opening the door for new creative opportunities.

“With Hollywood and the leading technology companies that already cover these innovations, we see the transformation in the production available for creators and enterprises of all sizes,” he said.

Brown’s personal experience with AI secures his belief that taking new technology is important for further.

“I started creating generative images three years ago and went into a generative video about two years ago,” he shared. “In 2023, I participated in the AI ​​short film competition, where each aspect of the film was to be completed within 48 hours. With more than 3000 records, I was honored to become a finalist – what would be impossible only a year earlier.”

As the technology develops rapidly, Brown views AI integration as inevitable.

“The rate of promotion in these instruments is exponential, which makes them integration into creative work processes not only transformation but also inevitable,” he summarized. “Those who cover the II will receive significant advantages over those who oppose it, and this is far beyond the film industry.”