British politics has yet to catch up with Trump’s new order
Open the White House viewing newsletter for free
Your Guide to What is the US 2024 Choice for Washington and the World
Keyiri weren’t you well? He went out of the oval office without humiliation. He asked this question about Donald Trump’s desire, the member of which Charles is the head of state. He filed a random promise from him, which is always standing with the British, organized mainly the European Leaders’ summit and refused to capture the vice president’s detachment from Dehnds.
I don’t mean to ridicule Starmer. He has shown strategic stability and has been properly praised Parliament Monday:A number of the former conservative foreign minister said that he had “not wronged”, while the Liberal Democratic leader threw the Britain “takes the world.”
It is clear that a prime minister should have a gibbon on the world stage. But we are discussing in the imperfections of the execution, climate, in which the visit the country’s closest ally bears the risk of episode Squid game:A number of success avoids humiliation, dodging tariffs and NATO salvation. And during the days, Trump choked the fight from Ukraine. The world has changed, but Westminster did not catch.
The Prime Minister is right to fight for the Atlantic Alliance, but this stimulates the residual hope that normality can usually be restored. The deputies are pronounced, but the deputies of all parties are clinging to the hope of climbing the president to the inside of the tent. This is worth the effort, but there is no reason to plan for planning anymore.
The viewing of discussions on Monday should be considered a politician who has not yet adapted to the changed world, which is now the best of the Western security rock, a chronic unreliable ally. Few people have appealed to the largest deployment of British troops in Ukraine. This reminded me of the first week of Sovim 19 before mortality and locks, particularly the March 2020 budget of Risni, which continued on the priorities of Boris Johnson’s government, that his entire agenda was not prepared by the already visible crisis.
Such a thing happens now. Stepper and his team see the weight of events, but politics still remains in that half world, knowing both not to know. The deputies applauded his promise to raise 2.5% of GDP to increase defense expenses (and the promise of the Vagar to achieve for a while), even if some mans for financing it. However everyone knows that it is not enough. The term of up to nine years is nonsense for what many already consider it an insufficient rise.
The use of the standard of own Vernacular, the re-equipment of new new European security architecture is now from the central “missions” of Great Britain. But the work still needs the effects of his own agenda. Until now, the treasury does not provide for 2.5% collateral. The current expenditures of the current expenditures in June are not intended to free more money for protection.
All this is very modest. The storage of this line is played with the security of the nation. More than 2.5 percent of interest is no longer reliable until at least 2028-29. It’s a new reality for which the government still needs to be adjusted.
Talks to the well-being of well-being, but significant reductions are planned and can be used to meet with Chancellor’s fiscal rules and financing other programs, including several savings. Young people back to work.
The Treasury refused to change his fiscal rules from his face, as well as Germany spectacularly made this week. It also refuses to return to work promise to increase basic taxes. Some options for running borrowing can occur but formal The debt is already too high by 95% of GDPA number And the United Kingdom has not yet felt the impact of tariffs.
Elimination of migration income can be found, although party strategists are worried that Ukraine’s public support will weaken if the price is higher. But this is no longer about Ukraine. We are talking about security of Europe.
The scale of the challenge means that it cannot be in existing programs. When it is accepted, unpleasant truths are waiting. If the treasury red lines keep, the resettlement value should be born in billions of additional cuts, which standard, its Chancellor Rakel Reves and working deputies seem meaningless. Starmer needs voters ready to choose a hard choice. If non-tax climb, don’t meet the ambitions.
If Britain’s upgrade is really a mission, it should be that the labor force will have to solve which priorities are decreasing. Is it zero zero dismantling targets that are already facing a significant political background? Which pure energy investments will be distracted? Supporters will argue that achieving energy independence is now more urgent, but 2030 targets already stretch are likely to avoid further.
Which infrastructural projects will miss the lack of funds? What about those new cities planned by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rainer? Which public services will be more cut or see improvements delayed? The United Kingdom must also consider planning its stability and maybe the subsidy processes, which allowed it to lose the anestraseneca vaccine.
The work should start this conversation with both its and the country. There is still a lot of business as usual. Extremely desire and distraction. It is now the primary mission to be prepared without the US security guarantees, and the British policy should be violent with the consequences of that reality.
English