Blake Lively struck the main strike because the judge blocks his summons

The actress raised Baldoni for her text messages and calls of calls, trying to find “receipts” to prove that he organized a smear campaign against her.

However, the judge denied Black Lille’s request for the call and text data to Justin Baldoni, designating it as “over -intrusive.”

The lively loss in court amid his legal hostility from Baldon after trying to access more than two years of information about the call and text of the director.

The 37-year-old guy asked for “documents concerning the entry and outgoing calls or text messages … During the time of December 1, 2022 to the present.”

Live specifically requested for him “call logs, texts, data logs and information about the location of the cell site”.

Unfortunately, for the busy, Judge New York Lewis Liman ruled in favor of Baldon, noting that her request could lead to the release of sensitive information related to doctors and psychologists, as well as communication with people who are not related to their business.

The judge also questioned the cause of Lively to request call data and texts two years before the Baldoni 2024 companies began.

“The living mainly states that summonses to court will help determine the” greater network “that immortalized against it a negative media company,” said Judge Liman, according to them Daily mail.

He continued: “But, according to Lailla’s complaint, this negative campaign began up to August 2024 … Therefore, it is unclear how communications before and from the party parties in 2022 and 2023 would discover the people who participated in the campaign.”

Despite the fact that her request was denied, Judge Liman did not completely close the mother of the four people when he ordered the liar to transfer the summons to court.

The judge also defeated the lawyer’s argument when they tried to block alive from the request of third parties about similar materials to open in her search to prove that he initiated a smear against her.

“The Wayfarer parties can approve interest in their own phones, but they have not presented the grounds for approval of interest in communication without participants,” Judge Liman said.

Earlier, Lila’s lawyer claimed that by initiating the detection process, the actress could “expose people, tactics and methods that worked on” destroying “and” bury “her reputation and family for the last year.”

They noted that these “receipts” are not on the site of Mr. Friedman “, citing lawyer Baldoni, Brian Friedman and the web -resort, on which the actor shared his hostility.

In response, Baldoni’s lawyer crashed into Lila as a “large -scale fishing expedition”, which proves that the actress and her representative “desperately seek any actual basis for their proven false claims.”

“They ask each call, text, data magazine and even real-time location information over the last 2.5 years, regardless of the sender, recipient or subject,” Friedman said, also noting that Lively would also not find anything to prove his claims.

Recently, Lively filed augmented complaint, which claimed that two of her “ended with us”, which were not named, would testify that support her allegations against him.

The Age of Adalin claimed that two actresses also had an awkward experience of Baldon; However, she refused to call them or share the screenshots of texts to protect their privacy.

“However, it is important, however, these victims gave Ms Liveli to divide their communication in a supplement when they are outlined, and they will testify and produce documents in the process of opening,” Lively said, according to Daily mail.

In her modified complaint, the alive stated that she had sent her a mutual girlfriend and Baldoni, that the director “ended with us” paused “to her.

According to PageSixThe text in question was sent on May 24, 2023, in which the star “gossip” said an unnamed woman: “I would like to put you tomorrow. These people.

She also told her friend that she went home and “cried”, describing Baldoni and hit as “creeping”.

“Like, keep your hormones. It’s not mine. I don’t want it,” the alleged text reads.

She also wrote: “I don’t want you (sic) to look, words, tongue, or video from your bare wife,” referring to the video shown about his wife, born naked, that the lively claims she “thought” porn first.

The living concluded her message, saying: “It’s shocking. Clown.”

Since then, Baldoni has responded to a complemented complaint with his lawyer Friedman, who traded him “insufficient”.