Blake Liveli and Justin Baldon expresses against the background of a protective order, wait
Blake is alive and Justin BaldoniThe legal groups spoke as long as they were waiting for the judge’s rulings at the request of the actress on a stronger protective manner.
On Thursday, March 6, the hearing, Lila’s lawyer claimed that the Baldoni team “created the wrong disclosure”.
“We want to stop the public publication of this information in the case of opening. The rules are trying to prevent the burden on third parties,” the actress’s lawyer said on Thursday. “We should not force dozens of third parties who see in court to defend. We must reduce the load on third parties. He must refuse a third subpoena for a security firm that protects the living and Reynolds.”
Brian FriedmanThe lawyer of the 41-year-old Baldoni announced his claim in his own statement to the judge.
In the new application received by US Weekly, Blake Lively was fired after he was charged with trying to “prevent the public” to see “relevant evidence” in her legal struggle against Justin Baldoni. After a recent request, Lively about an advanced protective order – who asked the conditions “only eyes of a lawyer” to retain certain information (…)
“This is the questions” for the eyes of the lawyer, “Friedman said on Thursday.” This is the case where no one intends to harm Ms Liveley. She spoke in detail about sexual harassment and put it there. My customers were found guilty when it was filed. My client has the right to fight and defend myself. We want to agree with the protective order and put the burden of the party that wants more defense, go to court and be transparent. “
The Lively team also wanted to defend their private correspondence with loud figures.
“There is a high probability of irreparable harm when marginal conversations with loud people who are unrelated to the case were falling into someone else’s hands,” her lawyer said.
Meanwhile, Friedman replied: “We cannot treat the people of celebrities and people who are powerful in the field other than other people.”
While the official ruling was not issued on Thursday, the judge shared the decision “quickly”.
In February, the news was that he was alive, 37 years old, and her husband, Ryan Ryinolds. demanded more strongly than the standard they were provided when it is and It ends with us Costar Baldoni first filed his lawsuits.
“As described in detail in the complaint by Ms Liveli, Ms Liveli, her family, other members of the acting, various witnesses and people who publicly spoke in support of Ms Livel, received violent, obscene, sexy and threatening communications, a letter from Lively and Reynolds “Additional Protection”.
Earlier in December 2024. In December 2024, he stated that he had sexually persecuted it and promoted a “hostile working situation” at the 2024 set It ends with us. She made changes to her complaint Last month, in detail about the alleged “emotional influence”, which it faces legal cases.
Justina Baldoni Brian Friedman’s lawyer has forcibly responded to Blake Layla’s request for Gag’s order in the current court case of former interlocutors concerning the shooting of this. “The irony is not lost with anyone that Ms Lively was so fossilized from the truth that she moved to him,” – Friedman (…)
“Emotional impact on Ms Liveley was extraordinary, not only affects her but also her family, including her husband and four children,” the court documents received Us Read. “There are days when she is fighting for getting out of bed, and she often chooses not to go outside.”
The living also claimed to have received several violent messages in social media amid legal drama. Baldoni denied all the charges. He too filed a defamation lawsuit Against the living and Reynolds earlier this year. (Meanwhile, the married couple denied the allegations.)
“Everyone who receives violent messages from anonymous parties. When private parties were illegally charged with a live and paid team for violations, they received permanent death threats and visiting private homes where young children reside after their addresses were traced to her initial complaints,” Baldon said Us In February, in a statement regarding a request for a Lively security order. “Nobody should face this, especially private parties that do not have the means for security details. We do not justify the dangerous rhetoric aimed at anyone, regardless of the situation.”
English