Blake live fears of “mental health problems” are at risk

The couple asked to keep their texts with “loud” people in the confidential, referring to the Baldoni camp could be traced to the press.

However, Justin Baldoni Baldoni Brian Friedman’s lawyer struck Blaik Livel and Ryan Reynolds, calling their proposal “unnecessary”.

Live and Reynolds want their conversations to be kept in particular, because their permanent judicial battle with Baldon’s salary.

At a hearing at the Federal Court of Manhattan on Thursday, Prosecutor Maryl Constant manages that the couple wants a protective order before they divided conversations with “loud” people about “Lale’s time” ending with us “if they are afraid that Baldoni can be traced to the press, for the press, for the press, for the press Rocking stone.

The lawyer explained in court that such texts would have a high “PR value”, regardless of whether they were relevant to the fact.

“There is a high probability of irreparable damage when marginal conversations with loud persons who are unrelated to the case were falling into the wrong hands,” the government said.

“There are 100 million reasons for these parties to accumulate information because the PR price exceeds the court’s order,” the lawyer added.

According to the news checkpoint, Prosecutor Lale went further to urge Lewis Liman’s judge to place an additional security layer known as the “prosecutor” category, for such texts, as well as information about the mental health of the parties and the security measures they took among the hostility.

Managing clues that such a designation can be placed on information that included “talking about children, deep mental health problems or places of private residences and homes.”

When the estate asked in control if she implies that Baldon’s lawyers are “risk” for the live and Reynold security, the lawyer replied “no.”

However, he manages that he noted that co -authors of Baldoni include people “whose whole life is based on information to the press and the creator of the content.”

Baldoni Brian Friedman’s lawyer has since struck at the request of the couple, saying that it was “unnecessary” and “abusive, that anyone offered us to ignore the protective order.”

Friedman added that the planned and Reynolds plan are unfair to “celebrities” and “people who are powerful in this field.

He also explained that the so -called “model” of the protective order, which was submitted to the court to avoid leaks of confidential information in the case that already provides sufficient protection.

“My customers have the right to defend themselves, they are entitled to transparency,” he said in court, according to NEW YORK POSTAdding that its proposed installation should not be “abused” alive.

Judge Liman did not immediately adopt his ruling, saying that he would soon fulfill his view. “However, he warned that since the case caused public interest,” there is a presumption of public access “in federal buildings.

The estimate added that the existing conditions of the proposed protective order are already forbidden by third parties from the leakage of confidential information into the press, adding that any leaks may be in disrespect for court, which risks a fine or even in prison.

This happens after the estuar offered on Tuesday that it could give up New York Times As a defendant in the trial of Baldon against the busy.

Jane Virgin star denied sexual harassment allegations that the “gossip” actress cut him and filed a $ 250 million claim that had published her allegations.

In the future, he followed $ 400 million against the busy Reynolds and their publicist Lesli Sloon, accusing them of conspirating his reputation and control over the film.

However Judge Liman said New York Times’ On February 28, the petition to justify the case proposed by “a significant reason for dismissal” and “strong, indicating that his petition petition may succeed.”

The latest court hearings are taking place after the court late Lively asking for more than two years of the director’s call and text data were denied by the judge’s judge.

The lively requested “documents concerning the interests and weekend calls or text messages … During the period of December 1, 2022 to the present.”

However, the estimate has made a decision in favor of Baldon, saying that the request could lead to the release of confidential information related to doctors and psychologists, and communications with people who are not related to their business.

The judge also questioned the cause of Lively to request call data and texts two years before the Baldoni 2024 companies began.

“The living mainly states that summonses to court will help determine the” greater network “that immortalized against it a negative media company,” said Judge Liman, according to them Daily mail.

He continued: “But, according to Lailla’s complaint, this negative campaign began up to August 2024 … Therefore, it is unclear how communications before and from the party parties in 2022 and 2023 would discover the people who participated in the campaign.”