Arthur Russell Brand proposed by Warner Bros.

Frame Russell brand From his movie “Arthur” in 2011 may serve as a charge of a sexual attack on the set.

Currently, the comedian is facing criminal liability in the United States about the allegations of being sexually assaulted by a crew member during the shooting and put himself at the participants.

Now Warner Bros. Discovery suggested translating a few hours of invisible shots from Arthur during a case when the studio is also called the defendant.

Brand’s legal troubles continue to increase when Warner Bros. proposed to convey its films Arthur as potential evidence in his current NYC sexual attack.

According to TermIn a recent hearings in the Supreme Court of New York, the Patrick Lamparel’s studio prosecutor showed that they have “several hours that overcome the videos … four -you will be more, about eight” which they are willing to roll over.

Although it remains unclear what the footage can hold, the brand accuses Jane Dai of exposing himself to participants before sexual attacks on her to the toilet. The attacks could potentially capture something incriminal.

In the same hearings, the brand’s lawyers tried to detain the case, claiming that the UK would be “overlapping” with the current criminal case of the actor, but the request was reached by Judge Shlom Khagler.

As depending on NEW YORK POSTThe brand is worried that he will face charges in the United States after he was injured with five sexual offenses in the UK after a long investigation into his past cases.

His lawyers tried to detain a civil lawsuit filed by Jane Dai in 2023, fearing that he could “block” his criminal probe in the UK

In the submission of April 1, the brand’s lawyers noted, “the fact that Mr. brand is already faced with a criminal investigation in the United Kingdom – in combination with highly publicized charges that were made (both plaintiffs and others) that Mr. Here.

They added that the actor didn’t want to say anything that could be infused with his legal issues in the UK

However, the Judge New York refused to detain a civil lawyer at the request of the brand’s lawyer.

In the UK, the brand is accused of rape, inappropriate attack, oral rape and two articles of sexual attacks related to four women.

Capital police confirmed the allegations on Friday, April 4, a press release on their site.

The statement also in more detailing the time of the incidents that led to the charges, pointing the terms between 1999 and 2005.

“In 1999, the woman was raped in the Bornmouth area. In 2001, the woman was obscenely attacked in the London district of Westminster. In 2004, the woman was orally raped and sexually assaulted in the Westminster London. said in a statement.

Authorities also demanded that anyone who has suffered from the case in this case, or anyone who has any information will speak. “

After the charges, the brand should appear in court for his first hearing on May 2.

In response to the allegations, the brand switched to its Instagram page to deny the long video.

“We were very lucky to live at a time when there is so little trust in the British government,” he began. “We are very lucky, I suppose it happened at a time when we know that the law became a kind of weapon used against people.”

The comedies continued to admit that in the past he lived in the past, characterizing his former “fool”, “drugs and sexual addict” and even “insincere”. However, he denied being a “rapist”, according to the allegations against him.

“I have never been engaged in unmistakable activity, I pray that you can see it by looking into your eyes,” the actor added.

He also mentioned that he feels “gratitude” for the opportunity to argue with innocence in court when the trial began.

British police have launched an investigation into the Brenda’s last behavior in September 2023 after the Sunday Times, Times of London and TV Network Channel 4 on some charges against him.

The result of the investigation showed that the brand was allegedly subjected to sexual attacks and raped four women between 2006 and 2013.

One of the women, Nadia, said Daily mail This brand raped it at its residence in Los -Angeles on the morning of July 1, 2012. She claimed that the brand offered her to participate in sexual activity with him and a friend who was waiting in her bedroom. However, when she refused her proposal and tried to leave, he continued to rape her against the wall without a condom.

Another woman claimed that the contradictory comedian attacked her when she was 16, and they were emotionally offensive. It was reported that Russell was in the early 30’s at the time.

At the time, the brand also denied these accusations, saying that it was “very disorderly in its past,” but it was always a consensus.