Anthropic wants you to use AI – just not apply for his jobs

In a comic case of irony, Anthropic, a leading developer of artificial intelligence models, asks the candidates to their open work roles to certify that they will do so Do not use AI in the application process.

The anthropic develops a Claude, a chatbot that is well appreciated because of its friendly conversational tones and encoding abilities. The company has raised nearly $ 11 billion in funding from companies with deep pockets such as Google and Amazon to compete against Openai in the artificial general intelligence race or AI that can replace most people for most tasks. She recently demonstrates Claude’s ability to Take control of user’s devices To complete the tasks for them, the form of “agent AI” that Openai has also built upS

For all the inflated and spinning about how great they turned into AI chats when pushing Push to hit, the anthropic clearly does not think he is good enough to replace a person entirely. “Although we encourage people to use AI systems during their role to help them work more quickly and more efficiently, please do not use AI assistants during the application process,” the applications said. “We want to understand your personal interest in anthropic without mediation through the AI ​​system, and we also want to evaluate your communication skills that are not assisted. Please indicate yes if you have read and agree. “The field was first noticed by the open source developer Simon Willison and reported by 404 mediaS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqx18kgizae

Of course, someone has to develop AI systems first, so it makes sense. Computers themselves have no characteristics inherent in people, such as agency or creativity. The Openai Sora Video Generation model can make impressive videos, but one still has to use his taste to create something fascinating and interesting to watch.

There is great anxiety in the world of software engineering that AI will replace engineering jobs, even if AI encoding models still make many mistakes. AI supporters say the technology will simply make developers more efficient and therefore capable of developing even more programs that would not have resources to build in the past. However, skeptics believe that major companies leaders will replace people with AI, even if they know that it is not as good as a person, since labor is almost always the largest center for costs in company. Salesforce and Clearly They have publicly published that they have been able to replace customer service functions with chatbot, but we do not have a clear picture of what this really means and how experience is compared to the support of man.

At least for now, the anthropic is not quite ready to put his money where his mouth is. As for the mission critical tasks, the company still wants to know that one can do all the work. How should other companies think about using AI to interpret this?