Another thing to agree to Europe and the United States: ‘Free speech’

President Trump and European tariffs are interpreted by the war of the war in Ukraine and the existence of the European Union. However, they are also divided over free speech – with potential remote effects according to how the digital world is adjusted.

EU is investigating US companies Digital Services ActA new law to prevent online spreading of illegal content and disinformation. In the first major event, near the regulators as soon as possible put Important punishments – including the requirements for the change of products and product changes Elon Musk’s Social Media Platform, Xthat the law has been violated.

However, Mr. Trump’s leadership law hit against the free speech: the allies are ringing online, but as protests in universities, it limits the types of expression of expression.

President argued He is in the risk of losing its beautiful rights for the freedom of speech. The president has JD Vance defendant The European peoples of the “digital censure” limits many very right sounds on the Internet due to their laws.

Both the board and large technology companies claimed that the allies and the rules of rejection of the European Internet Disinformation and the rules of fiery speech in the Internet – the United States could fight against the United States.

Since Mr. Trump’s inauguration, Europe and the United States collided with many times. Mr. Trump in Ukraine supported and threatened not to defend European peoples who do not have enough investment in their security. Mr. Trump in Trading announced this week Extensive tariffs In Europe. When European regulators begin to apply new social media rules, the free word becomes another flashpoint.

“Now this is a failure: the free output dispute is affected every aspect of Trans-Atlantic relations,” David Salvo, researcher David Salvo in the German Marshall Foundation in the Democracy building. “It’s a mess.”

2024 Prior to the election, Mrance Mrance argued in a podcast that America could think of NATO’s support for American values ​​and free speech. Mrance in February question He warned the security conference in Munich and “Free Word, Afraid, Retreating”.

Such interpretations come as American leadership argued with Universities speaking in campuses, Palestinian activists arrested, overthrown journalists The White House has canceled the strikes related to the person in the federal institutions from the press pool and Policy This has caused banned books in certain schools – exciting actions of free speech watchman.

And to criticize the laws of officials in Europe, and for sure that some ideas are not preached, such as some ideas are pressed, they helped to criticize their laws.

“We are not a truth,” he said, the European Commission’s EU Executive Department, the European Commission’s representative of the European Commission “in the 1984” state promotion “

Again, some digital services can be attacked by Europe’s final policy. White House in February A memorial was published EU technological laws warned American companies to be investigated to target unjustly.

“Of course, our feeling is to use tariffs to push Tech regulation,” he said.

Tensions last for decades. Europe has chosen more to a long time to talk, and America prioritize personal rights except for almost everything immediately public Security. Germany is legitimate from a certain speech related to Nazism, and other countries limit certain forms of hatred speech against religious groups. In Denmark, this illegitimate Burn the Quran.

However, although these nuanced differences are available for a long time, the Internet and social media gave this issue to the point of geopolitical pressure. And this is dramatically aggravated by new management.

Digital Services Law does not ban specific content, but it is directed to conduct security measures and transparent security measures to delete the contents of illegal laws based on national or international law.

“This is a question that your services are safe to use and respect your business law,” said Margrethe Vestager, from 2024 to 2024 since 2024 to 2024.

Christel Schademose, who is a shepherd by negotiations for the European Parliament, said that the law will protect the free performance. He said, “You do not have the right to strengthen.”

The case against the X will be the first main test of the law. In the first part of the investigation, the last part of the regulators came to the conclusion that the authorities were x Breached the law Due to the lack of a valid account system, weak advertising transparency and not to inform researchers abroad.

In another part of the case, EU officials investigate the impairment of the X-handed by the user to create a center of other materials that can be used by the hand-in-hand-reaching, disinformation and democracy.

This week, x gossip EU’s actions were “an unprecedented act of attack on political censorship and free speech.”

EU officials, Mr. Trump’ın, had to draw geopolitical traces of a company belonging to one of the closest consultants.

“Will they hurt the guy with a friend-Buddy with the president?” Said William Echikson, the head of a non-resident in the European Policy Analysis Center.

X is not the only major technological company in conversation.

The EU can eventually take back them in the United States, using META, Facebook, Instagram and Facebook, Instagram and Ribs in the United States. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of the company, called The EU rules and defended the defense of US technology companies against attacks.

This is not the first time for the United States and Europe’s different standards for speech on the Internet. European Courts shortened The idea that information about a person can have Deleted from the Internetthe so-called “right to be forgotten”. American law experts and politicians evaluated this as a violation of free speech.

However, Mr. Trump and major technology companies exploded by its selection are expanding the space.

European officials informed that the Trump administration did not prevent their values ​​and new legislation. The next few months will be a workers trying to see how much they can adhere to these plans.

When he visited Washington earlier this year, to talk to MPs, Ms. Schaldemose, he said he found little appetite for trying to understand the arrangement that helped them to occur.

“It does not correspond to the agenda of the department: it does not help to understand,” he said. “We are not targeting them, but it is regarded.”