Adam Houley talks with fraud in the preference against a possible ban

Rate this post


Log in to this, roommates! Trump’s administration seeks to limit Americans to use unhealthy foods. Naturally, the potential prohibition inspired ambiguous reactions in social media and abroad. Earlier this week Adam Houley—Not is married Tamera Mowry.He was weighed, emphasizing his experience with food fraud.

Related to: Say Sick?! Social media in commercial mode after the White House shares this message about Valentine’s Day

Here’s the context on a potential ban

During the last 48 hours, Tamer Maura’s husband waited for people who, he said, missed the item in their recent comments. So, let’s break what he actually said. February 18 Adam replied to the post Referring to the New York Times article. The post highlighted Robert F. Kennedy -Younger.A potential ban on unhealthy foods for SNAP receipts, additional nutrition assistance programs.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Kennedy -Younger and New Secretary of Agriculture Pavement rolinz Want to limit certain treats, such as “soda or processed products” from getting right. The program opens about $ 113 billion to about $ 42 million.

“The only place I would say we needed to really change the policy is the Snap and Food Stamps and School Lents program,” Kennedy Jr. said at Fox News last week. “In many cases, the federal government pays for it. And we don’t have to subsidize people to eat poison.”

In a separate interview, Roliniz agreed with the Kennedy movement “to make America healthy”. she said, “When the taxpayer invest in Snap, they are fine with us, using their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sweet drinks to children who may need something more nutritious?”

Adam Houley calls on past fraud with stamps

On X Adam Houley explained his past experience with people who commit fraud using brands.

“… I can’t tell you how many times I have seen people come and buy shit for my children with food stamps, and then open your wallet and use cash for alcohol, beer, wine and cigarettes,” wrote Adam Houley. “Then there were those who had repeatedly bought a lemon or lime, got a change, came out of the door, threw them out and do it again. Until they had enough changes to buy cigarettes or alcohol. As a child, it angered because there is People who could really use help and then there are others who work in the system. “

To clarify, SNAP benefits are now available on a debit card. However, as a child’s childhood, the recipients used stamps of physical food – think of the cropped coupons! As the critics were recruited, he explained in another message how the receipts received “changes” from the brand to use in non -food subjects. Adam also recognized A modified brand system to the card.

As Tamera Mowry’s husband continued to twist, mixed reactions also continued to spill! In other positions, he specified that he did not mind the people who receive help but has problems with alleged corruption.

That’s why limit your Snap shopping will be difficult

However, removing certain products from Snap is not as easy as it sounds. The program is managed by USDA, not HHS, and is entered through individual states. It is authorized by the 2008 federal nutrition and nutrition law. This law states that the benefits of SNAP can be used for “any food or food designed for human consumption”, except for alcohol, tobacco and hot food, including those preparing for immediate consumption.

According to senior analyst Katie Berg, without which food will require Congress to change the law or for the states to get a refusal to limit purchases. For the last twenty The legislators in several states offered to stop paying water in bottles, soda, chips, ice cream, decorated pies and “luxurious meat” as steak.

“None of these requests have never been approved in accordance with the republican or democratic presidents,” Berg said.

In the past, officials of the agricultural department rejected the refusal. In the 2007 document, the agency stated that there are no accurate standards to define food “both good, bad or healthy or not healthy.” In addition, the agency also stated that restrictions would be difficult for implementation, difficult and expensive. And they may not change food purchases or reduce conditions such as obesity.

Bills are considered in Congress and several states to limit SNAP benefit from baking soda, candy and other items. Res. Josh Brihan, Republican Oklahoma, sponsored the Law on Healthy Snot.

“If someone wants to buy unhealthy food on their own penny, it depends on them,” he said. “But what we say,” Don’t ask the taxpayer to pay for it, and then expect

Related to: Beefin ‘with the media? The White House defends the decision to ban journalists Associated Press after the controversy “Bay of America”

Associated Press staff Johnel Aliycea and Mary Conlon contributed to the report.

What do you think the room?



 
Report

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *